Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
• <br /> jy • <br /> PLANNING DRAFT MINUTES .10-21-85 <br /> •20 <br /> MOTION: Pokey moved to amend the original motion to include <br /> condition 02 ( Left turn Lane on Old NC 86 at Lafayette <br /> Orives . Seconded by Miller. <br /> PiLkey expressed a concern for future traffic in the <br /> area. Shanklin responded that Old NC 8H <br /> would <br /> 7r <br /> eventually need a Left turn lane but he feLt the <br /> developer was not responsible for the traffic generated <br /> and should not bear the cost of the improvements. Kizer <br /> noted he felt the project did generate the traffic <br /> problem, and it was the developer's responsibility to <br /> protect the residents. <br /> VOTE: Notion Amendment. <br /> In favor 10. . <br /> Opposed 1 (Shanklin} . <br /> Yuhasz questioned if there would be a recommendation to <br /> include open space in this subdivision if no open apace <br /> were provided. Smith responded no. Yuhasz continued, <br /> $' noting that the developer was providing open space when <br /> not required and was being asked to provide even more. <br /> Gordon stated there was nothing in the Subdivision <br /> Regulations to require open space in subdivisions, and <br /> Smith noted this was correct. <br /> Kizer inquired who was responsible for maintenance of <br /> open space. . Cochrane responded the Homeowners <br /> Association . <br /> MOTION: Yuhasz moved to delete condition 04. Seconded by <br /> Pearson . <br /> VOTE: In Favor 6 (Yuhasz, Pearson , Kizer, Shank Lin, Jacobs, <br /> Walters) . <br /> Opposed 5 (Gordon, Pilkey, Miller, Kramer, Best) . <br /> VOTE: Main Motion <br /> In Favor 10 <br /> Opposed 1 (Kramer) <br /> - <br /> Kramer expressed concern about density and felt there <br /> was not enough preparation for future phases. <br /> AGENDA <br />