Agenda - 09-30-1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

DRAFT PLANNING. BOARD MINUTES 9-16-85 20 MOTION: Shanklin moved that the Board find that the applicant does comply with the general standards . Pearson seconded the motion . Yuhasz clarified that a "yes" vote on this matter would dictate that if the Land Use Plan amendment is approved, the planned development is appropriate. VOTE: In favor: Kramer, Pearson , Yuhasz, Shanklin Opposed: Best , Pilkey, Walters, Jacobs Abstention : Miller MOTION: Pearson moved that if the Planned Development is approved that the conditions as recommended by staff be attached . Shanklin seconded the motion . Yuhasz asked that staff explain 06 . Smith clarified it referred to a property description by plat . Pilkey expressed concern about the Location of the ponds in the railroad right—of—way, rather than on property the applicant owns .. Yuhasz clarified that Chandler owns the Land in the right—of-way. He added that he had raised the question regarding how close structures can be to the railroad at the public hearing. Pearson commented he could see no difference in the Location of the ponds in or out of the right—of—way. Jacobs suggested that a condition be attached requiring the ponds to be fenced to keep out children and animals . Yuhasz indicated this would restrict maintenance activity . Jacobs felt that a physical barrier is needed . Shanklin questioned the liklihood of children on the property . Best commented that he had seen 6 children , in three groups of two on Sunday on the property. The Board discussed fencing materials . Jacobs clarified that he desired "suitable" fencing to stop small children from accessing the ponds . MOTION AMENDMENT: Pearson amended the motion to include the condition that suitable fencing be installed around the holding ponds to prevent access by children and animals . Shanklin accepted the motion amendment .