Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
• • - <br /> 186' <br /> DRAFT PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 9-16-85 18 <br /> through approval of the amendment and given that <br /> the planned development process provides control . <br /> AGENDA ITEM #8C: P0-4-85 CHANDLER CONCRETE <br /> Smith reviewed the request noting that the <br /> applicant had not satisfied the lot size and <br /> landscaping requirements which could , however, be <br /> addressed through conditions of approval . <br /> MOTION: . Yuhasz moved positive findings on 8 .8 and 8 .8 . <br /> Pearson seconded the motion . <br /> VOTE: a in favor. Miller abstained . <br /> MOTION: Yuhasz moved positive findings an 20.3 .2 al , b1 <br /> and d1 . Pearson seconded the motion . <br /> Smith noted that the Board could address te1 on <br /> the basis of their previous decision . She advised <br /> the Board that they were to review the evidence <br /> and comment on it as part of the process in making <br /> the findings . <br /> Pearson commented an (d1 that staff had determined <br /> the DEM stipulation to constitute a changed <br /> condition . <br /> Jacobs responded that the problem was due to wrong <br /> actions by the applicant . Pearson noted there <br /> were no previous regulations , Kramer added that <br /> change must be made if one is told to stop a <br /> certain activity. <br /> VOTE: In favor : Kramer, Pearson , Yuhasz, Shanklin <br /> Opposed: Jacobs , Pilker , Welters , Best <br /> Abstention: Miller <br /> MOTION: Pearson moved positive findings on 20 .3 .2 a1 and <br /> bl . <br /> Jacobs seconded the motion . <br /> VOTE: 8 in favor. Miller abstained . <br /> Pearson commented that concerns with On reflect <br /> the discussion and vote on the Land Use Plan <br /> amendment . <br /> MOTION: Pearson moved positive findings on 7 .4; 8 .2.4; 4.2 <br /> and 4.3 . Shanklin seconded the motion . <br /> VOTE: 8 in favor. Miller abstained . <br />