Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-30-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 09-30-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 8:18:00 AM
Creation date
9/12/2016 3:02:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/30/1985
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> • • 186 <br /> • 6 <br /> hazardous and that they will not be leaving the site which would substantially <br /> improve the current situation. <br /> He described the recycling facility noting that the solids and liquids <br /> derived from the system will be reused in the plant as recycled materials. <br /> . • Until this system is in place accumulated solids will be removed by trucks. <br /> Post cited a map prepared to illustrate the nature of the request noting . <br /> the actual acreage to be utilized for the operation is very limited once you <br /> identify right-of-way, open space and screening proposed. Eve clarified that the . <br /> area designated in pink is the use area and includes .711 acres. <br /> Post clarified that the applicant must meet the specifics of the site <br /> plan upon development of the site. He continued-that maintenance of facilities <br /> installed is also required as a condition of approval and that this would <br /> address landscaping and the integrity of system. <br /> • Fritz Brunssen, engineer for the applicant, addressed traffic flow. He <br /> noted that driveway C is in the middle of the turn and has limited sight. <br /> . distance and that the applicant proposes to use Driveway B to enter and load <br /> the vehicles and then use Driveway D to exit the tract. Be continued noting • <br /> that NCDOT accepted the proposed driveway as having safer sight distance and <br /> that the driveway is higher than the road. He noted that truck parking will <br /> not be seen. from the road and that those on the other side of the railroad <br /> cannot see the basins due to a combination of plant material and fencing. <br /> • He summarized that the proposal would result in improved traffic <br /> arrangements, improved landscaping and total compliance with environmental <br /> regulations. <br /> Plantains Board member Kizer inquired about the total concentration of <br /> the liquid in the ponds. Chandler responded that there are 10 parts water to <br /> . 1 part muriatic acid. He informed the Boards that this acid is purchased and <br /> stored in 55 gallon drums and diluted on a 10-1 basis for utilization. . <br /> Kizer inquired how much acid is used a month. Chandler responded that <br /> they use 5.5 gallons a month generally, but that use is not determined on a <br /> scheduled basis. This is determined by the plant manager and related to the <br /> number of trucks out of use. He clarified that they use 550 gallons of diluted <br /> muriatic acid monthly. <br /> Kramer inquired about the structures to be located above ground <br /> associated with the ponds. Post responded that the pumps will be placed <br /> underground. He described the process indicating that the water would flow from <br /> the wash area in the plant area to the first pond and that the liquids will be <br /> pumped out of the second basin. The third basin would accommodate a storm <br /> event. Liquids would be pumped to- an existing. overhead tank. <br /> • Yubasz asked the applicant to describe the recycling system. Post <br /> indicated that it utilizes a conveyor belt which scoops heavier material out of <br /> a bin filled with water laden material. Chandler indicated that there are many <br /> models on the market and that they are generally 16-20 feet long and 8 fbet <br /> wide. <br /> Yuhasz inquired how close landscaping may be placed to the railroad <br /> • tracks before the railroad company objects. Brunssen responded 15 feet. He <br /> continued that existing vegetation in the area is not to be disturbed and that <br /> additional vegetation will be added. <br /> Best inquired if the sand and gravel reclaimer mentioned is also the <br /> recycling facility. Post responded yes. Best asked how high is such a <br /> facility. Chandler responded six feet. <br /> Pilkey inquired about projected water usage and the depth and rate per <br /> minute of the well. Chandler responded that the well was installed when the <br /> plant was built and though he did not know how deep it is, it was installed by <br /> the Dodson Well Co. He indicated that he had replaced the pump once since <br /> acquiring the plant. He noted that the facility was also connected to city <br /> water, but that well water was preferred as the temperature of the water is - <br /> constant. He noted there was a storage tank on site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.