Agenda - 09-30-1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

5 motion to approve the 1.41 acre request resulted in a 4 to 4 vote with one abstention. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the request. PUBLIC REAR= WAS DECLARED CLOSED. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded byConadssioner Walker to approve the recommendation of the Planning Staff. Commissioner Marshall stated that the three conditions required by the Ordinance have not been met. The request is not to correct an error or omission in the plan, and it is not in response to changed or changing conditions and is not a response to changes in the Land Use Policy. Commissioner Carey noted the only justification the applicant could • have for requesting a change in the Land Use Plan would be a change in the conditions, and he is not convinced that the change in conditions asserted by • the applicant were conditions that the Board had in mind when the plan was adopted. Be feels, however, there is a significant risk of damaging the environment surrounding the area if the problem is not corrected. Geoffrey Gledhill indicated that the request is a change to the Land Use Plan and not a change to the Zoning Atlas. A change to the Zoning Atlas would occur upon the approval of the Planned Development application. Chair Wilihoit stated that under the current Land Use Plan and with the current zoning designation, Chandler Concrete could relocate the ponds to other portions of the existing plant site, and no further permits or approvals would be required. Be proposed that this item as well as item G-10 relating to the Special Use Permit be tabled and referred to the Planning Staff for the development of a landscape plan that would specifically address those concerns brought out at the public hearing. Planning Director Marvin Collins indicated the screening as proposed by the applicant does meet the requirements of the Ordinance. The only concern is that the screening is not extended around to the rear of the property adjacent to the railroad. Commissioner Lloyd questioned the need for additional screening requirements. Geoffrey Gledhill stated that the Board must make the decision on the land use designation independent from the Special Use Permit consideration. In this particular case, the Board may impose additional screening requirements that go beyond the requirements in the Ordinance. VOTE: AYES, 3; NOES, 2 (Commissioners Marshall and Carey) . 10. PD-4-85 HANDLER COMMIE COMPANY (Public Bearing to receive the recommendation of the Planning Board) Planner Susan Smith presented the recommendation of the Planning Board on a request for a Planned Development-Industrial III Special Use Permit for 1.41 acres of property owned by the Chandler Concrete Co. The request was submitted to public hearing on August 26, 1985. A Planning Board motion for approval of the request resulted in a 4-4 vote with one abstention. The Planning Board recommends that if the Board approves the request that nine conditions be attached. PUBLIC BEARING WAS DECLARED CLOSED. Chair Willhoit expressed a concern for the lack of screening around the rear of the property. He proposed that the Planning Staff develop additional screening requirements and submit them at the next meeting. The Board could then impose these additional screening requirements as part of the • special conditions imposed on the project. • =rtuglelThe :1=11 bStyaffCcliviliscangbi°rneingr Lloyd to ttiotilthrld=1=2:881 forth specific recommendations on additional screening requirements at the next meeting. There was various discussion on whether or not to permit those in the audience to speak on this item. The question was called. VOTE ON THE QUESTION: UNANIMOUS.