Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
DRAFT PLANNING BOARD MINUTES• 9-18-85 i 8' . <br /> through approval of the amendment and given that <br /> the planned development process provides control . <br /> AGENDA ITEM #90: P0-4-85 CHANDLER CONCRETE <br /> Smith reviewed the request noting that the <br /> applicant had not satisfied the tot size and <br /> landscaping requirement's which could, however , be <br /> address-ad through conditions of approval . <br /> MOTION: Yuhasz moved positive findings on 8 .8 and 8 .8 . <br /> Pearson seconded the motion . <br /> VOTE: a in favor. Miller abstained. <br /> • <br /> MOTION : Yuhasz moved positive findings on 20.3 .2 al , bl <br /> and C . Pearson seconded the motion . <br /> Smith noted that the Board could address ( el on <br /> the basis of their previous decision . She advised <br /> the Board that they were. to review- the evidence <br /> and comment on it as. part of the process in making <br /> the findings. <br /> Pearson commented on Cdl that staff had determined <br /> the OEM stipulation to constitute a changed <br /> condition. <br /> Jacobs responded- that the problem was due to wrong <br /> actions- by the applicant. Pearson noted there <br /> were. no previous regulations , Kremer added that <br /> change must be made if one is told to stop a <br /> certain activity . <br /> VOTE: In favor: Kramer, Pearson , Yuhasz, Shanklin <br /> Opposed : Jacobs , Pilkey , Walters , Best <br /> Abstention : Miller <br /> MOTION: Pearson moved positive findings on 20 .3 .2 a) and <br /> bl . <br /> Jacobs seconded the motion . <br /> VOTE: 8 in favor . Miller abstained . <br /> Pearson commented that concerns with Cd] reflect <br /> the discussion and vote on the Land Use Plan <br /> • amendment . <br /> MOTION: Pearson moved positive findings on 7 .4; 8 .2.4; 4.2 <br /> and 4.3 . Shanklin seconded the motion . <br /> VOTE: 8 in favor . Miller abstained . <br />