Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
015 <br /> DRAFT PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 9-16-85 8 <br /> Shanklin expressed concern that sight <br /> distance in itself is not the answer . He <br /> felt we are creating places for accidents to <br /> happen . <br /> Yuhasz asked if DOT would comment . Smith <br /> responded that DOT does not comment on <br /> private roads or minor subdivisions . <br /> Gordon inquired if DOT certification was <br /> required. Smith responded this applied to <br /> "public" roads , especially new roads or a <br /> non—residential subdivision for driveway <br /> permit purposes . <br /> VOTE: In favor: Gordon , Pitkey, Miller , Shanklin , <br /> Kramer, Best, Jacobs <br /> Against: Pearson , Walters , Yuhasz. <br /> AGENDA ITEM #7: MATTERS SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING — NOVEMBER 4, <br /> 1985 <br /> a . Erosion Control Ordinance Amendments <br /> Presentation by Warren Faircloth <br /> This agenda item is to review and discuss <br /> proposed revisions to the Sedimentation and <br /> Erosion Control Ordinance. <br /> The North Carolina Sedimentation Control <br /> Commission has approved a revised Model Local <br /> Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control <br /> Ordinance to make it consistent with changes to <br /> he Sedimentation Pollution Control Act and its <br /> Regulations . The Commission has requested that <br /> all local governments administering such <br /> ordinances revise their local ordinance to <br /> conform to the Model Ordinance . <br /> The proposed revisions to the Ordinance will <br /> noteffect the application or enforcement of the <br /> Ordinance. The revisions are mainly minor <br /> changes to the wording of the Ordinance . <br /> Several definitions will be added to the <br /> ordinance and the wording of others changed . <br /> Revisions are being made to the administrative <br /> procedures for contacting property owners <br /> concerning violations . A time Limit for the <br />