Orange County NC Website
096 <br /> applicant could not comply with DF2I requirements and closure of the plant could <br /> eventually occur. <br /> Gordon read the reasons for making a Land Use Plan Amendment. Post <br /> noted that his client was responding to a state requirement and he felt this <br /> was a changed condition. <br /> Harry Harkins, an attorney from Chapel Hill, representing the Rhine <br /> family who own the land surrounding the Chandler Concrete plant, spoke. He <br /> noted there-would be three additional speakers is opposition to the amendment <br /> to the LUP. <br /> Be continued expressing more firmly the opposition to the amendment for <br /> three reasons: he felt it was bad policy, set a bad precedent„ and it was not <br /> necessary to the operation of the Chandler Concrete plant. He stated that from <br /> meeting to meeting the applicant had changed his needs- or reasons for the <br /> requested amendment. He felt only two lagoons were needed and the proposed <br /> driveway. was unnecessary. He also felt that a way could be found for location. <br /> Of the lagoons on land that Chandler already is using and that the barriers <br /> that are being stored by contractors working on 1-40 could be stored anywhere. <br /> He and his clients greatly oppose the expansion of industrial use into this <br /> residential area. <br /> Harkins continued stating that Chandler had purchased land without <br /> checking into the zoning and had begun using the land in violation of the <br /> zoning regulations. Harkins' clients, the Rhine family, bad to report the <br /> • nonconforming use to the County before the action was corrected. He further <br /> stated that he and his clients felt that this was simply a means to expand the <br /> operation of the existing concrete pl ant. He read from the Zoning, Ordinance <br /> the reasons for change and noted that he did not view the situation as "changed <br /> conditions", but simply an expansion of the use after purchase. He also <br /> reminded the Boards that Commissioner Marshall had asked for the May 28 public <br /> hearing evidence to be placed in the record. <br /> Commissioner Marshall noted that she only asked for b <br /> the minutes to be <br /> entered into the record and if Mr. Harkins had some particular item of record <br /> to be entered be would need to make that request. Harkins then requested that <br /> all evidence presented by the opposition at the May public hearing be entered <br /> as part of• the record of this hearing. <br /> Dr. Sally Feather spoke expressing the concern that her property was the <br /> most affected by the requested LUP amendment. She noted that the use and <br /> enjoyment of her land has been seriously jeopardized by the concrete plant <br /> already. She continued noting she had registered her property as a National <br /> Wildlife area and the wooded area was placed in a forest management program. <br /> She is also participating in the nutrient sensitive watershed program operated <br /> by the State Division of Water Resources. She felt that the hard work done on <br /> one side of the road to preserve and protect the land had been destroyed by the <br /> fact that just on the other side of the road trees had been destroyed and land <br /> • cleared. <br /> Betsy Rhine spoke stating that she had been living across the road from <br /> Chandler Concrete property long before it was a concrete plant. She continued <br /> that everyone in the area who are concerned ire here to stay. She expressed <br /> concern that the request for less land in this amendment request was supposed <br /> to be a compromise, but yet it seemed that everything Mr. Chandler wanted <br /> originally was included in this site plan. She expressed concern with traffic <br /> safety, health and welfare of the area. She also stated that residents of <br /> Joppa Oaks complained of stinging, burning eyes from the acid solution used to <br /> clean the trucks. She continued that the hazardous acid solution should be <br /> protect the County. <br /> Use Plan left as is to ec y <br /> the Land se <br /> dumped elsewhere and P <br /> mp <br /> Alan Fields, a resident of Strayhorn Hills, inquired if after the ten <br /> year period the property in question could be used for any purpose or if it <br /> must stay with this same use. Gordon responded that the Ten Year Transition <br /> Area is a land categorization meaning the land is expected to go from rural to <br /> ' urban in a ten year period. <br />