Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
• <br /> 091 <br /> • ORANGE COUNTY <br /> BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br /> Meeting Date SEPTEMBER 30. 1985 <br /> Action Awinda <br /> Item # ( , <br /> • <br /> SUBJECT: PROPOSED SECONDARY AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE PLAN <br /> REQUESTED BY CHANDLER CONCRETE COMPANY <br /> DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes X No <br /> Attachment(s) Information Contact : GENE BELL <br /> SEE 8-26-85 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA AND HANDOUTS <br /> DRAFT 8-26-85 PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES <br /> 5-28-85 PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES <br /> 8-26-85 LETTER FROM J. S. HARDER <br /> PHOTOGRAPHS: SITE & ENVIRONS [CONTACT STAFF) <br /> II DRAFT 9-16-85 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES • <br /> Telephone Numbers <br /> Hi L isborough - 732-8181 <br /> Durham - 688-7331 <br /> Mebane - 227-2031 <br /> Chapel Hill - 968-4501 <br /> PURPOSE: To consider a proposed secondary amendment to the Land Use Plan <br /> for 1 .41 acres of a 7 .25 acre tract [inclusive of street and <br /> railroad rights-of-way) owned by Chandler Concrete Company, <br /> Inc . The property in question is located on the south side of <br /> Old N.C. 10 (SR 1710) approximately one-half mile from the I . <br /> intersection with N. C. 86 . The property is referenced as Tax <br /> Map 45, Lot 32 in Hi l Lsbo rough Township . <br /> To receive the Planning Board recommendation on the request . <br /> This item was submitted to public hearing on August 26 , 1985. <br /> NEED: The request for redesignation of the 1 .41 acre site from Rural <br /> Residential to Ten Year Transition/Commercial-Industrial <br /> Transition Activity Node has been submitted to LegelLy address <br /> wastewater runoff problems from an existing concrete plant <br /> site Under a directive from the N .C. Department of Natural <br /> Resources and Community Development - Division of Environmental <br /> Management (DEM) , the applicant attempted to contain runoff <br /> with retention Basins. The basins were constructed on property <br /> owned by the applicant and which were located in an R-1 zoning <br /> district. The applicant erroneously thought the site was zoned <br /> for industrial purposes and the use of property for retention <br />