Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-30-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 09-30-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 8:18:00 AM
Creation date
9/12/2016 3:02:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/30/1985
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br /> PERTAINING TO <br /> APPLICATION: Z-3-85 ROBERT A. RACHAEL S. SCHOLAR <br /> kr' <br /> 1T <br /> BASED ON THE APPLICATION MATERIALS SUBMITTED, THE PLANNING - BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT THERE IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING <br /> FINDINGS: <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING <br /> Article 20.3.2 indicates that the application shall comply with the applicable sections of Article 20 <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING ("Yes" indicates compliance; "No" indicates noncompliance) <br /> PLANNING BOARD <br /> FINDINGS BASED ON <br /> Ordinance Requirements SUBMITTED APPLICATION Evidence Submitted To Su2port Findings BOCC FINDINGS <br /> The application must comply <br /> with all requirements speci- <br /> fied in Article 20 - Amend <br /> ments. Those requirements <br /> nnclu e: <br /> 20.3.2 a) Map showing affected X Yes No Site Plan provided at scale of 1" a 100' ' _Yes No <br /> property at scale of not less <br /> than 1" = 100' nor more than <br /> I" = 20' <br /> 20.3.2 b) Legal description X Yes No Description provided with application _Yes No <br /> of property _._._. <br /> 20.3.2 c) Explanation of alleged X Yes No No error alleged Yes No <br /> error, if any, to be corrected by <br /> proposed amendment <br /> 20.3.2 d) Changed conditions, If X Yes No Applicant has indicated the development Yes No <br /> any, which make amendment reasona- _..._ Is adjacent to property currently zoned <br /> bly necessary to promote public R-10. <br /> health, safety and general welfare <br /> 20.3.2 e) Manner in which proposed •X Yes ' ' No Applicant indicated the property is located Yes No <br /> amendment will carry out purpose in a Ten-Year Transition area. <br /> and intent of adopted Comprehensive <br /> Plan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.