Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
077 <br /> 7 <br /> in the northern part of the subdivision to shift <br /> the houses on the lots. Some parts of the <br /> subdivision are more Limited than others, but there <br /> can still. be some variation in the setbacks. <br /> A council member asked if you apply the setbacks to <br /> the lots that are in Chapel Hill's jurisdiction , <br /> would those Lots meet minimum requirements? <br /> Collins answered affirmatively . <br /> Collins referred to the recommended conditions of <br /> approval included in the agenda packet , <br /> specifically condition number 7 and S. <br /> He added that condition number 10 should be <br /> expanded to include an additional sentence that all <br /> roads be built to Town standards. Sweet Creek Road <br /> would be a Class A in accordance with Chapel Hill <br /> standards. ALL the stub—outs presently shown on <br /> the site plan, plus one additional stub—out, would <br /> be constructed to Class S standards and all the <br /> cul—de—sacs presently shown on the site plan would <br /> be constructed to Class C standards. <br /> Regarding condition number 14 the Chapel Hill staff <br /> pointed out that the recreation area situated south <br /> of Sweat Creek Road as shown on the site plan is a <br /> Little over two acres in size. If you apply the <br /> Orange County recreation space ratio and Chapel <br /> Hill requirement, a total. of 3.2 acres would be <br /> required for the entire project . What has been <br /> shown is less than that amount . The Town of Chapel <br /> Hill recommends that additional recreation space be <br /> provided on the site plan so that the total <br /> recreation area is 3.2 acres for Chapel Hill and <br /> Orange County combined. As for the County 's <br /> requirement, they have satisfied the requirements; <br /> if they wish to provide additional recreation space <br /> they could do so within the Chapel Hilt <br /> jurisdiction area . <br /> • <br /> Collins noted condition number 24 relates to <br /> Chapel Hill's jurisdiction . <br /> Nassif raised questions about the pond design <br /> asking if there were lots proposed downstream from <br /> the pond . <br /> Collins summarized the Orange County staff position <br /> that the applicant complies with the general <br /> standards and regulations with the exception of the <br /> three negative findings. He continued that staff <br />