Agenda - 09-10-1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• • • 6.57 TABLE 1 New- Developments and Associated Trip Generation PM Peak. Generation Added Development Size Rites- Trips Kensington Trace 135 du .60/-dwelling 81 Coventry 43- du 1..00/dwelling 43 Timberlyne Village 144 du .60/dwelling 86 Cambridge Place 171 du .40/dwelling 68 Steeple Chase- 16 du 1..00/dwelling. 16 Booker Creek IV • 30 du 1 .00/dwelling. 30 Kirkwood 108 du. 1 .00/dwelling 108. Windy Hill 91. du 1 .00/dwelling 91 Highlands. 91 du 1 .00/dwelling 91 Booker Creek Village 30' du 1..00/dwelling 30 Summerf iel d. Crossing 1.40 du 1 .00/dwelling 140 Timberlyne Shopping 130850 sf 14.42/1000 sq. ft. 1887 Timberlyne- Offices ' 23903 sf 2.20/1000 sq. ft. 53 - M.1•NIWMOMO +�� 2724 We based our trip generation calculations on rates found i n ale Qenerat•ign;, Third Edition.. Institute of Transportation Engineers. We used. rates for the PM ak hour our of adjacent street traffic. Ca TRIP DISTRI$UTI Q4 Trip distribution can be described as the tendency of drivers. to use certain routes before entering or after exiting a trip generator. An estimate of trip distribution usually is based on a general knowledge of drivers' trip origins and destinations. These origins and destinations depend on the land use patterns throughout the community. We made a series of assumptions about how vehicles would approach or leave. developments in the corridor. We then estimated trip distribution to and from each project for the streets and intersections within the corridor. AS;I Gl+1E'*1T QF TRIPS We estimated the paths that drivers entering or leaving the various developments would travel while in the corridor. We focused our attention especially on how the trips would move through the three critical intersections.