Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-03-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 09-03-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 8:02:55 AM
Creation date
9/12/2016 12:24:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/3/1985
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Accuracy- and the Limitations of Projections <br /> Few capital projections allow a precise determination of need. Exceptions are <br /> facilities such as water and sewer treatment plants. Capacities of these <br /> facilities are determined by hydraulic design and state-established standards for <br /> -treatment. Failure to provide plants, pumping capability or water- and sewer line <br /> capacity can limit development in an affected area. The ability of a water <br /> system to provide water sufficient for fire protection is much less precise. While <br /> not necessarily limiting growth, the inadequacy of a water system can affect the <br /> community's fire protection rating and consequently the fire insurance cost to <br /> consumers.. <br /> The subject of highway adequacy is even more subjective. Who can determine <br /> how long people will put up with how much congestion? Each year the NC <br /> Department of Transportation (NC DOT) solicits requests from local' officials of <br /> highway needs for consideration and possible inclusion in the State's <br /> Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). However imprecise, these requests <br /> are used here as indicators of need under the heading "requests". It should also <br /> be noted that the NC DOT Transportation Improvement Program for 1985-1994' <br /> although subject to change, is the source of transportation cost figures listed in <br /> this report. <br /> Projections dealing with educational and recreational needs are subject to <br /> interpretation as well. School needs are subject to standards such as class size, <br /> but otherwise lack the exactitude of the standard for water treatment. Likewise' <br /> recreational facilities and parks have standards but they are not universal. In <br /> most cases the need is what the governing body says it is. This same definition is <br /> applicable in the case of other facilities such as a town hall, fire station or <br /> library. <br /> Financing Development <br /> Bonds: The financial situation of the local governments involved is critical to the <br /> issue. Local governments can increase their capital facilities in a variety of <br /> ways. In the financing of expensive improvements to meet the needs of the <br /> future, one option is bonds. Bond financing is attractive as it allows those users <br /> for whom the improvements are made (i.e., future taxpayers) to participate in <br /> the cost. General obligation bonds will attract more favorable rates than revenue <br /> bonds to provide for utilities. Conservation of a unit's credit rating is essential. <br /> A complete analysis of this issue is beyond the scope of this report but a brief <br /> look has been taken at the indebtedness of local governments. <br /> 1-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.