Orange County NC Website
U 0 0121 i 3 <br /> Motion was node by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner <br /> Walker to approve the amerdment to Section IV-5-3-C-2 as stated below: <br /> Ppxtial Widths - A partial width right-of-way may be allowed in a <br /> subdivision where: <br /> la) in the judgement of the Planning Board and with the approval <br /> of the Board of County Commissioners, it is found that the <br /> nature and location of the subdivision, including such <br /> considerations as topography, the surrounding area, the <br /> present and future road plans, and' access by public safety <br /> vehicles, are such that a partial width right-of-way is <br /> justified, and, <br /> (b) The.access serving the subdivision is classified as either a <br /> Class B or Class C road according to the Orange County Private <br /> Road Standard; and, <br /> (c) The right-of-way width provided is adequate to allow for the <br /> construction of a travelway, ditches, shoulders and turn <br /> around reqaired for the class of road serving the subdivision; <br /> and, <br /> (d) The right-of-way width provided would allow access by the <br /> largest emergency services vehicle serving the district in <br /> which the subdivision is located; and, <br /> (e) If one or more of the following g conditions are met <br /> (1) when the partial width right-of-way adjoins undeveloped <br /> property and is greater than 25 feet in width, and when <br /> said adjoining undeveloped property is subdivided and <br /> the remainder of the full required right-of-way can be <br /> dedicated. <br /> (2) When access to the subdivision is across property owned <br /> by other than the applicant and the property owner is <br /> unwilling to grant, sell or otherwise convey the full <br /> required right-of-way width to the applicant. <br /> (3) When pre-existing conditions preclude the provision of <br /> full right-of-sway due to the pattern of adjacent <br /> development, historical common access an/or site <br /> specific physical constraints. <br /> VOTE: UtOMMOUS. <br /> !Lp RuAM TD A02V-IM M MEM 02nwCE <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner <br /> Lloyd to approve the corrections listed below found in the minutes of the <br /> Board of County Commissioners regarding anxnaments to the orange County Zoning <br /> Ordinances: <br /> October 4, 1982 - Amendments to 4.1(8) and 6.16.12 - add; The motion <br /> carried. <br /> October 4, 1982 - Amendments to 6.16-6.1 (q) and 6.16.6.2 (g) - <br /> revise to read correctly. <br /> July 5, IM - Amendments to 8.7; 8.7.1, 8.7.2; 8.7.3; 8.8 - revise <br /> to read Don willhoit moved, Shirley Marshall seconded the changes in 8.7; <br /> 8.7.1, 8.7.2; 8.7.3 and 8.8. <br /> April 17, 1984 - Amendment to 11-10 - revise 11.11.10 to read 11.10. <br /> February 19, 1985 - Amendment to 4.3, 6.3.1; and Article 22 - revise <br /> to read motion was made by ammissioner Marshall, seoor4ed by Commissioner <br /> amended as <br /> Lloyd that. 4.3 and Article 22 of the Zoning Ordinance be <br />