Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-03-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 09-03-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 8:02:55 AM
Creation date
9/12/2016 12:24:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/3/1985
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
083 <br /> El <br /> Walters irrqui red if the road was constructed before <br /> approval . Smith responded that staff had already <br /> reviewed the sketch and oka LI <br /> .yed the general Layout so <br /> the developer could pursue the construction of the <br /> road so as to have everything complete by the tine <br /> the final plat was signed off on and recoHad . <br /> Walters inquired why Frazier Road was not considered <br /> in the beginning . Shepherd responded citing reasons <br /> for submitting the subdivision as drawn, : Lot 3 .- has <br /> an approved septic tank Location in the . north <br /> corner; for the proposed Lots there would have be <br /> two crossings of the creek to get to Frazier Road; <br /> and three hundred feet from the southernmost point. <br /> from Lebanon Road is the only point for access to <br /> meet NC DOT sight distance, at which point the road <br /> would have to cross the creek at its most critical <br /> area . <br /> 11 DT 10 1-11 Pearson moved approval. with staff conditions noting <br /> that NC DOT did not say unsafe, but undesirable . <br /> Seconded by Kizer . <br /> Kizer noted that the ordinance requirement was far <br /> =~ <br /> the road to be built to private road standards <br /> These standards do not ;pacify sight distance . <br /> He felt this was a minor p rob Lan. ; he wo*uLd Like to <br /> have another hundred feet but there is no basis to <br /> turn this project do wn based on the Private . Pioad <br /> Standards . <br /> Gordon stated that the Subdivision Regulations could <br /> a PL,r a requirement for safety . Gordon continued b ir <br /> P I A <br /> reading Section IV—AI Mininum Design' Standards . <br /> Kizer noted that traffic is taken care oa <br /> I mo re <br /> specifically Later on in its own section 1.1h.2re it <br /> says the road shaLL meet certain dasign standards . <br /> PiLkey expressed concern that' this project is in a <br /> watershed and that traffic saf ety was also a concern <br /> as she knew of an .accident at this point *whara people <br /> were kiLLed . She continued that she fa Lt this project <br /> vies poorly designed and the developers were Gutting <br /> corners . <br /> Pearson inqu.i •ed if the road running with the stroDia <br /> would be better for- the watershed . <br /> Kizer stated that he felt the VeC-,Uir-ements o 'I' the <br /> Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations hnd been <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.