Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-26-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 08-26-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2016 11:23:31 AM
Creation date
9/12/2016 11:57:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/26/1985
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> Kizer inquired what the anticipated results were if the request for LOP <br /> amendment is denied. Post responded that if the request were denied, the <br /> applicant could not comply with DEM requirements and closure of the plant could <br /> eventually occur. <br /> Gordon read the reasons for making a Land Use Plan Amendment. Post <br /> noted that his client was responding to a state requirement and he felt this <br /> was a changed condition. <br /> Harry Harkins, an attorney from Chapel Hill, representing the Rhine <br /> family who own the land surrounding the Chandler Concrete plant, spoke. He <br /> noted there would be three additional speakers in opposition to the amendment <br /> to the LUP. <br /> He continued expressing more firmly the opposition to the amendment for <br /> three reasons: he felt it was bad policy, set a bad precedent, and it was not <br /> necessary to the operation of the Chandler Concrete plant. He stated that from <br /> meeting to meeting the applicant had changed his needs or reasons for the <br /> requested amendment. Be felt only two lagoons were needed and the proposed <br /> driveway was unnecessary. He also felt that a way could be found for location <br /> of the lagoons on land that Chandler already is using and that the barriers <br /> that are being stored by contractors working on 1-40 could be stored anywhere. <br /> He and his clients greatly oppose the expansion of industrial use into this <br /> residential area. <br /> Harkins continued stating that Chandler had purchased land without <br /> checking into the zoning and had begun using the land in violation of the <br /> zoning regulations. Harkins° clients, the Rhine family, had to report the <br /> nonconforming use to the County before the action was corrected. Be further <br /> stated that he and his clients felt that this was simply a means to-expand the <br /> operation of the existing concrete plant. He read from the Zoning Ordinance <br /> the reasons for change and noted that he'did-not view the situation as-"changed <br /> conditions", but simply an expansion of the use after purchase. He also <br /> reminded the Boards that Commissioner Marshall had asked for the May Wpublic <br /> hearing evidence to be placed in the record. <br /> Commissioner Marshall noted that she only asked for the minutes to be <br /> entered into the record and if Mr. Harkins had some particular item of record <br /> to be entered he would need to make that request. Harkins then requested that <br /> all evidence presented by the opposition at the May public hearing be entered <br /> as part of the record of this hearing. <br /> Dr. SAlly Feather spoke expressing the concern that her property was the <br /> most affected by the requested LUP amendment. She noted that the use and <br /> enjoyment of her land has been seriously jeopardized by the concrete plant <br /> already. She continued noting she had registered her property as a National <br /> Wildlife area and the wooded area was placed in a forest management program. <br /> She is also participating in the nutrient sensitive watershed program operated <br /> by the State Division of Water Resources. She felt that the hard work done on <br /> one side of the road to preserve and protect the land had been destroyed by the <br /> fact that just on the other side of the road trees had been destroyed and land <br /> cleared. <br /> Betsy Rhine spoke stating that she had been living across the road from <br /> Chandler Concrete property long before it was a concrete plant. She continued <br /> that everyone in the area who are concerned are here to stay; She expressed <br /> concern that the request for less land in this amendment request:was supposed <br /> to be a compromise, but yet it seemed that everything Mr. Chandler wanted <br /> originally was included in this site plan. She expressed concern with traffic <br /> safety, health and welfare of the area. She also stated that residents of <br /> Joppa oaks complained of stinging, burning eyes from the acid solution used to <br /> clean the trucks. She continued that the hazardous acid solution should be <br /> dumped elsewhere and the Land Use Plan left as is to protect the County. <br /> Alan Fields, a resident of Strayhorn Hills, inquired if after the ten <br /> year period the property in question could be used for any purpose or if it <br /> must stay with this same use. Gordon responded that the Ten Year Transition <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.