Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-26-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 08-26-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2016 11:23:31 AM
Creation date
9/12/2016 11:57:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/26/1985
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
requirements for residential/co mercial use in all applicable building code 2 <br /> areas. <br /> No one spoke in opposition to the request. <br /> 2. SECONDARY AMEl►J MENr To THE LAND USE PLAN .RJouEg'TED BY CHANDLER <br /> CRETE COMPANY, INC. <br /> The presentation was made by Gene Bell. <br /> This agenda item is to receive public ant on a proposed secondary <br /> amendment to the Land Use Plan for 1.41 acres of a 7.25 acre tract (inclusive <br /> of street and railroad rights-of-way) owned by Chandler Concrete <br /> Cyf Inc. <br /> The property in question is located on the south side of Old NC 10 (SR 1710), <br /> approximately one-half mile from the intersection with NC 86. The property is <br /> referenced as Tax Map 45, Lot 32 in Hillsborough Township. <br /> The request for redesignation of the 1.41 acre site from Rural <br /> Residential to Ten Year Transition/Commercial-Industrial Transition Activity <br /> Node has been submitted to legally address wastewater runoff problems from an <br /> existing concrete plant site. <br /> Under a directive from the NC Department of Natural Resources and <br /> Community Development - Division of .Environmental Management (DE 4), the <br /> applicant attempted to contain runoff with retention basins. The basins were <br /> constructed on property owned by the applicant and which were located in an R-1 <br /> zoning district. The applicant erroneously thought the site was zoned for <br /> industrial purposes and, the use of the property for retention basins as well as <br /> for truck parking resulted in a zoning violation. Upon official notification <br /> from the Planning Department, the nonconforming use of the property ceased. <br /> The request is a new application. The applicant previously submitted a <br /> proposed amendment for 4.34 acres of the property to public hearing on May 28, <br /> 1985. In the Board of Commissioners review (August 5, 1985) of the request <br /> decision, it determined that new information had -been' submitted after the <br /> public hearing and directed that the request be sent back to public hearing as <br /> a new request on August 26, 1985. The Board also directed that the rezoning <br /> request for the same property be considered at the same public hearing. <br /> The proposed amendment would change the Land Use Plan (LLIP)designation <br /> of the 1.41 acre portion of the property from Rural Residential to Ten Year <br /> Transition/Commercial-Industrial Transition Activity Node making it compatible <br /> for rezoning to PD I-3. Rezoning would make it. possible for the <br /> legally pursue on-site wastewater retention and recycling. <br /> applicant to <br /> The Planning Staff recommends approval of the request. <br /> Bell continued listing �' amending equest. <br /> three reasons for which the Plaan n ayy be amended as fllows U Plan and the <br /> (1) Because of changed or changing conditions in a particular area or <br /> areas of the County <br /> (2) 'lb correct an error or omission in the Plan <br /> (3) In response to a change in Land Use Policy <br /> The applicant cites 41 as his reason for request for amendment and lists <br /> several changes of a nonresidential nature which have taken place in the area <br /> since the concrete plant was established. <br /> A condition not mentioned by the applicant nor brought out in the <br /> Central.-Orange Area Study is run-off from the concrete <br /> logical to assume that runoff has been a condition associated with tthe concrete <br /> plant site since it was established in 1982. Likewise, the recent recognition <br /> of the runoff as a problem by DEM would"seem'to qualify as a 'changed or <br /> changing condition". <br /> Pilkey inquired if a letter had been received from Southern Railroad and <br /> Bell responded no. <br /> Commissioner Marshall inquired if there had been any statement how the <br /> amendment would carry out the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan as <br /> this was not addressed in the application. Bell agreed that this had not been <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.