Orange County NC Website
• <br /> 046 <br /> WESTON LA BARRE 27 June 1985 <br /> 1T2 CAROL WOODS <br /> CHAPEL HILL,NC.27514 <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Mrs, Beverly Blythe <br /> Orange Co. Manager's Office <br /> • 106 E. Margaret Lane <br /> • Hillsborough, N. C. <br /> Dear Mrs. Blythe: • <br /> As we discussed in the Board Room <br /> • yesterday, both Road Assessment Bill #99586 and <br /> #99587 are erroneous, because of mistakes in the tax <br /> map from which the assessments were made. Since we <br /> • are all in agreement, this letter is written according <br /> to your suggestion. <br /> On Bill #99586 (omitting Lot #71 which <br /> • has no frontage on Wilkins Drive), Lots 72 (509, 73 (60') <br /> 7h (501), 75 MO, 76 (60'), and 7712e#B1. Univ Hts <br /> 16A.A.5A, Tract 72h062 -- come to a total of 320' <br /> instead of the 370,- on the bill. At the assessment rate <br /> • of S2.17h. Per linear foot, this bill for 320' should • <br /> come to $695.68. qu's r ' _ <br /> • - <br /> • - <br /> _ There 's 142=1: .J . er direction <br /> on Bill #99587. Bl. University Hts., Map )ILA, Blk. <br /> • 15A.A.5, Tract 7287h69.,Lots 66 and 67 have erroneously <br /> been totalled at 100' whereas on the correct map at the <br /> Register of Deeds, Lot 66 is 60' and #67 is 50, giving <br /> a total of 110' x S2.17h S239.1h instead of 100' , at <br /> S21710 error on the bill. <br /> We were not able to correct this error <br /> in footage at the public hearing because the footage <br /> was not specified in the preliminary statement, only a <br /> gross total. And since both figures that went into <br /> this gross total were wrong, there was no way to figure <br /> the correct rate of assessment. Only when the tax bills <br /> were presented were these errors traceable. • <br /> In order to meet the July 19 deadline, <br /> it has been suggested that we pay the amount which is <br /> correct according to the Register of Deeds map, not the <br /> erroneous road tax man from which the bills were made. <br /> Therefore, in my duplicate of this letter to the Orange <br /> • <br />