Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-20-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 08-20-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 4:26:11 PM
Creation date
9/12/2016 11:33:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/20/1985
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- • <br /> 5 <br /> Chair Willhoit requested the Manager look into the possibility of <br /> developing a payback policy for those individuals eligible for the Homestead <br /> Exemption to pay the assessment either over a longer period of time or when <br /> the property changes ownership. <br /> Geoffrey Gledhill pointed out that a new policy would necessitate <br /> that the entire PPP process be repeated. <br /> After further discussion about alternative ways for Mrs. O'Neal to <br /> pay the assessment, and/or to receive assistance, Chair Willhoit stated it <br /> would be unfair to do the entire procedure over because there would be an <br /> additional cost for administrative fees that would increase the cost of the <br /> project for each property owner. <br /> Camdssioner Marshall asked to have the approval delayed in order to <br /> make a determination if the assessment can be paid over a ten year period <br /> because such a system would help many older people in the same situation. <br /> No action was taken. Alternative solutions for paying the <br /> assessment will be outlined and presented at the next meeting. <br /> gi_ FIRST YEAR "WON 44 4 A. ' AraikA.1.4i_. (See permanent agenda file for <br /> a conplete copy of the report) . <br /> Peggy Pollitzer, President of Child Care Networks, introduced Carol Huyck <br /> who gave the annual report. Child Care Networks worked with 801 families <br /> during their first year. Most were looking for child care for children under <br /> the age of one. Same were new to the area and some were low income. The <br /> number of child care homes available has increased. Child Care Networks work <br /> with those individuals who would like to start a child care home and try <br /> to serve the entire County. She reiterated the concerns raised at the <br /> beginning of the project and how those concerns have been addressed. The <br /> organization has a good relationship with DSS, meeting on a regular basis to <br /> talk about mutual interests and concerns. They are working very effectively <br /> with the day care centers and making referrals to these centers. <br /> Petite Howard, Treasurer of Child Care Networks, outlined the funding <br /> sources. A family day care coordinator is still needed. There is also an <br /> individual funding campaign. <br /> F. IT/MS FOR DECISION ,(COUriNUBLA <br /> ,..W,I;01 *111 D•41,11 24‘,2011:4"V *II LAI-L. (See complete contract in <br /> the permanent agenda file in the Clerk's office.) <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner <br /> Carey to approve the contract as presented by the County Manager and authorize <br /> the Chair to sign. <br /> VCME: UNANIMOUS. (Ccendssioner Walker was not present for the vote) <br /> 3. WILKINS DRIVE PPP re! AriAtA _Li4V* <br /> Planner Susan Smith presented a request from Mr. and Mts. Weston <br /> LaBarre to correct the assessment for Lots 5 and 5A, Block A, Map 15A in <br /> Chapel Hill Township. She indicated that the tax map was wrong. However, Mr. <br /> LaBarre did not file a notice of appeal within the allowed ten days after the <br /> assessment roll was confirmed. <br /> Commissioner Marshall asked if the language in the notice sent out <br /> to the property owners is specific in indicating that the property owner has <br /> ten days in which to appeal the assessment amount. <br /> Smith indicated the notice does not specifically indicate the ten <br /> day limit for appealing the assessment. <br /> Geoffrey Gledhill indicated that the assessment role lists the <br /> property owners names, identification of property and assessed value. There <br /> is no information on how the assessment was derived. The property owner is <br /> told that the assessment role and map is available in the Clerk's office for <br /> them to review. If the Board finds an error has been made they may, by <br /> authority of G.S. 153A-198, set aside the assessment and start the procedure <br /> required of the project over which would change the cost to each property <br /> owner. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.