Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
122 <br /> QUESTIONS CONCERNING CHANDLER CONCRETE COMPANY <br /> 1. The basic issues are still the same about the land in <br /> question, so why has the Planning Department changed its <br /> recommendation? <br /> 2. Since this issue began, Chandler Concrete has rearranged <br /> • and raised the land surface so their original land which <br /> had been recommended by the DEM for the holding basins <br /> has now been made less desirable for that purpose. In <br /> addition, since the Public Hearing they have lowered <br /> the surface of the land in question around the basins <br /> to make them more useable. Was the Planning Department <br /> aware cf these actions by Chandler Concrete when they <br /> changed their recommendations? <br /> 3. A final question concerns the overflow of the basins to <br /> the stream below. (Yesterday evening we saw that the <br /> upper basin just east of the plant had been overflowing <br /> into the second basin and that one had been overflowing <br /> out the far back corner and running down to the stream <br /> that flows to the southeast. This second basin was <br /> still almost full at that time. ) This morning we noti- <br /> fied 1:r. Jerry Robinson of the Health Department of this <br /> fact. Are these basins really safe?? <br /> Betsy Rhine <br /> Sally Rhine Peathle/ <br /> Robert E. Rhine <br /> 7/15/85 <br />