Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
• <br /> 119 <br /> . 18 <br /> Pearson noted staff agreed with the changing <br /> conditions in the area which would warrant a rezoning . <br /> Gordon questioned the information staff was utilizing . <br /> Chandler noted that tots of information at the public <br /> hearing was incorrect citing for example DEM Letter of <br /> May 20, 1985 regarding an application for permit. <br /> Kizer asked what Rhine viewed as a favorable outcome <br /> to this situation . Rhine responded she would Like to <br /> see utilization of the originally identified DEM site <br /> adding this would be adequate. Kizer asked if the site <br /> identified by DEM is closer or farther from Rhine. <br /> Rhine responded it was farther and closer to a <br /> commercial versus residential area . <br /> Kizer asked Chandler what he viewed a favorable <br /> outcome to be to this situation . Chandler responded <br /> he must control the runoff, noting that the Land <br /> sloped in this direction prior to this situation . <br /> Kizer asked if he disagreed on the pits Location . <br /> Chandler responded that the DEM site was identified <br /> for use with a collection device. He continued that <br /> the reclaiming system could go on a different parcel . <br /> Walters asked if Chandler could be required to put a <br /> buffer on the new parcel to be rezoned and on the <br /> parcel already zoned. He continued asking how much <br /> Chandler needed and how much area the county needed for <br /> compliance with the ordinance. <br /> Pearson asked what the buffer requirements are . Smith <br /> reviewed the buffer requirements for use of the <br /> property if rezoned. She noted that screening would <br /> be required between the two zoning districts on the <br /> Chandler owned property and along the frontage of the <br /> newly zoned parcel . Pearson suggested that this would <br /> be an improvement to that which existed previously. <br /> Gordon reviewed the evidence given by the appraiser at <br /> the public hearing regarding the damage to the <br /> property value when the plant was installed . <br /> Pearson responded that he disagreed with the <br /> appraiser's testimony regarding the pits adding that <br /> screening would enhance the property . He continued <br /> that the Rhine house had Looked at the plant previous <br /> to this . <br />