Agenda - 08-05-1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• 118 17 could be recycled for cleaning the trucks. He also noted that he has both wells and city water. Kramer inquired the intention for use of the remaining acreage and Chandler repsonded he has no plans at this time. Best inquired if the second access could be used if the property is not rezoned. Smith responded no . Best felt it would be safer to use this second access . Chandler noted that NC DOT had suggested the second entrance. PiLkey inquired about problems incurred at other sites from cleaning out the trucks and Chandler responded he had not had trouble anywhere else. He explained how the dumping was handled in other areas and noted this • was the only place he had had to put in holding ponds . Ms. Betsy Rhine spoke. • She noted that Mr. Chandler had stated he did not know who made the original complaint and she stated the original complaint came from residents of Joppa Oaks. She noted that there was now a ditch that overflows into the pond thereby making it more suitable. She continued that the upper area where the barriers are now stored was raised, otherwise it could have caught the runoff. Commenting on a buffer, she indicated there was only a thin row of trees screening her property from the plant and that her property value would be affected. She addressed the comment about a second entrance noting that three driveways currently exist and that the westernmost appears the safest but is never used and is blocked by stored concrete barriers . Gordon noted that Ms. Rhine's question referenced as #1 still remains. She cited page 83 of the drafts minutes and reviewed Bell 's comments. Bell responded that the main issue was reduction in area and noted that this section was contiguous to the existing node and unsuitable for other use. Gordon clarified that the applicant was omitting future but retaining near future use areas in his request . She asked if this shrinking affected the staff's public hearing comments.