Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-05-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 08-05-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 4:22:57 PM
Creation date
9/12/2016 11:01:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/5/1985
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
112 <br /> there was adjoining land and the company would not be expanding the,use more <br /> than 10 acres; 2. company has been in area or 13 years, belonging to the <br /> • Chamber of Coerce and felt that they have been good corporate citizens in <br /> • their support of area projects such as school projects and United Way, 3. <br /> Company has 18 employees and 15 ready-mix trucks; which have brought payroll <br /> taxes and sales tax and property tax into Orange County. <br /> • Mx. Chandler continued by addresing the runoff problem. #e explained that <br /> the concrete remover used to clean the trucks does contain muriatic acid but <br /> • when mixed with concrete dust will be neutralized. If he is allowed to <br /> continue to use the ponds on the property he can set up the reclaiming system <br /> he needs to separate the sand and stone from the slurry. The lime would then <br /> settle out and could be used for application to agricultural lands. <br /> Gordon• inquired if Mr. Chandler would like to address the Locational <br /> Criteria as referred to by Bell. Chandler responded that he felt the land was <br /> well suited to the Year Transition plan, there was water to the property, <br /> it is not in the 100-year floodplain, the land slopes are no problem, it has <br /> good access both by road and railroad, is only a few minutes from center of <br /> Hillsborough, it is no threat to plants or animals, with no bad effect on <br /> forestry or agriculture and it is already in the transition area between urban <br /> and rural areas. <br /> Gordon inquired about changing conditions. Bell explained this step <br /> again. Chandler's response to this was the changes were commercial as the <br /> mini-warehouses and a convenience store have core into being since Chandler <br /> Concrete Plant was put into effect. <br /> Harry Harkins, attorney representing Dr. Sally Feather and Ms. Betsy <br /> Rhine, spoke in opposition stating that his clients felt that this request went <br /> to the very essence of why Orange County needs the Land Use Plan. It would <br /> destroy the buffer zone between the concrete plant and the residential area. <br /> Parkins noted that Chandler did not acquire this lard from the Rhine heirs. <br /> The property was sold to a real estate agent who later sold it to Chandler <br /> • Concrete. The Rhine heirs would never have sold this property for comnercial <br /> use. • <br /> Laura Feather, daughter of Dr. SPoly Feather, then read a letter (a. copy <br /> • of the descriptive narrative is in the permanent agenda file in the office of <br /> the Clerk to the Board) from Dr. Sally Feather in opposition of the amendment <br /> to the LOP. <br /> Ms. Feather continued, speaking in her own behalf. She felt the concrete <br /> company had shown a lack of regard for the well-being of the residents in the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.