Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-05-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 08-05-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 4:22:57 PM
Creation date
9/12/2016 11:01:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/5/1985
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 109 <br /> rezoning. They were warned against further use of the property <br /> • until it was brought into compliance with zoning ordinance. <br /> 4-17-85 Application for amendment of Land Use Plan received from <br /> Chandler. <br /> -5-8-85 Chandler Concrete was notified by attorney for Dr. Sally Feather <br /> and Ms. Betsy Rhine of pending legal action if non-conforming <br /> uses not terminated. <br /> . . <br /> 5-16-85 Complaint filed with Orange County Planning Department by <br /> attorney for Dr. Sally Feather and Ms. Betsy Rhine. <br /> 5-17-85 Chandler barricaded new driveway connecting site to Old NC 10 <br /> and ceased non-conforming use of property. <br /> 5-20-85 Planning Department net with DEM to discuss project history, <br /> options, enforcement action, etc., and to conduct site visit. <br /> 5-20-85 Chandler was formally notified V by the Orange County Planning <br /> Department that all non-conforming uses of the 4.34 acre tract <br /> must cease immediately until such time as properly zoned. <br /> * This reflects pain events and does not include all correspondence or tele- <br /> phone V calls regarding Chandler Concrete, State Agencies and opponents to the <br /> rezoning request. <br /> Bell stated that as of May 20, 1985 DEM still had not received necessary <br /> application materials from Chandler. DEN also noted that they had not advised <br /> Chandler to go off site with the retention facilities; in fact, they Vhad <br /> suggested they use the western portion of their tract which was being used to <br /> store concrete barricades at the tire. <br /> The procedures for amending the LUP states three reasons for which the LUP <br /> maybe amended. These are: Cl) because of changed or changing conditions in a <br /> particular area or areas of the County; (2) to correct an error or omission in <br /> the Plan; (3) in response to a change in land use policy. <br /> In response to the first test, Staff contends that this area haS been <br /> undergoing changes and that the Central Orange Area Study adopted in November <br /> 1983 adequately addressed these changes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.