Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-05-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 08-05-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 4:22:57 PM
Creation date
9/12/2016 11:01:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/5/1985
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
045 <br /> 10 - <br /> • Pearson stated that one did not have to have Health <br /> Department approval before subdivision , but a note <br /> would be placed on the plat stating these tots could <br /> • not be bOilt on until Health Department approval was <br /> granted . <br /> • Smith responded that this was true, but that a note <br /> must be on the plat stating that Health Department <br /> approval had not been sought and another document <br /> must also be recorded with this information . She <br /> continued by citing the ordinance requirements <br /> regarding certification from the Health Department . <br /> Pearson again noted that this was not needed to plat <br /> the property . Smith responded that staff would need <br /> assurance that there was no intention to build on the <br /> tots or else Health Department approval or a <br /> statement identifying Lots which did not receive <br /> Health Department approval must be recorded on and <br /> with the plats. <br /> Gordon inquired why staff submitted the plat . without <br /> Health Department approval . Smith responded that the <br /> Health Department had indicated they would be through . <br /> by Friday and staff did, not feel it was reasonable to <br /> hold up an applicant for thirty days simply because <br /> the Health Department did not organize itself to get <br /> the approval done. <br /> Alois Callemyn , Surveyor, stated that two <br /> appointments had been made with Health Department and <br /> he had been at the site both times and the Inspector <br /> failed to make the call . He continued that all. tots <br /> had subsequent been perked, but the Inspector wanted <br /> to do 2 lots again . Catlenyn noted that his client <br /> had given him permission to combine lots if necessary <br /> for this approval . He noted the only problem he had <br /> with dual driveways was that Lending institutions so <br /> often tell applicants they must have their own <br /> driveway. <br /> The answer to this is to widen the driveway to allow <br /> two drives . <br /> MOTION: Walters recommended approval with duaL driveways as <br /> recommended by Staff and Health Department approval <br /> on final plat . Seconded by Kizer . <br /> VOTE: Unanimous . <br /> g . North Fork (Section II ) — Preliminary <br /> no& <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.