Agenda - 07-01-1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• 6 (16) All plans for drainage, soil erosion and sedimentation control shall be reviewed and approved by Orange County. In addition, Orange County shall inspect the installation of control devices and the on-going work for the total project. The project shall at all times meet the requirements of the Orange County Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance. (17) The project must remain in unitary ownership and no lots can be sold to individuals. (18) A unit numbering system and corresponding unit location shall be filed with the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permit. This system shall be used in obtaining and issuing any building permit. Any change in the unit numbering system must be filed with the Orange County Planning Department. (19) A final boundary survey of the Planned Development and improve- ments shall be recorded by the developer. (20) The final site plan and narrative of the project incorporating all changes, deletions and additions through the final approval of the project are incorporated herein and made a part of this Planned Development Special Use Permit. A copy of the final site plan and narrative are on file with the Orange County Planning Department. Grading and building permits, upon appli- cation, will be issued after approval and recordation of the Special Use Permit. (21) The development shall be built and operated according to the site plan and written narrative supplied by the developer and in compliance with the above conditions. Commissioner Marshall asked if the Planning Board addressed the traffic problems and the devaluation of adjoining property values. Susan Smith indicated there were no points of discussion. DOT had indicated the traffic count in that area is not sufficient to be a concern. WITH NO FURTHER COMMENTS, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS DECLARED CLOSED. Motion was made by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to find the same positive findings as found by the Planning Board. VOTE: AYES, 4; NOES, 1 (Commissioner Marshall). Motion was made by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the recommendation of the Planning Board and the stipulations attached to the approval. VOTE: AYES, 4; NOES, 1 (Commissioner Marshall). 4,,, PRO-. POSE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS (see descriptive narrative on pages of these minutes). Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval two proposed Zoning Ordinance text amendments that were submitted to public hearing on May 28, 1985. This item was continued to receive the Planning Board's recommen- dation. The first amendment deals with the establishment and the permitted use table for 'Nonprofit Educational Cooperatives" as a Class A Special Use Permit permitted in the A-R zoning district. It would also add to Article eight a list of the specific requirements that a nonprofit association must submit and also add to Article 22 Definitions the definition of a "Nonprofit Educational Cooperative". The Planning Board recommended approval of the proposed amend- ments to Articles IV, VIII, and XXII. The second amendment had to do with a provision to Article 11 regard- ing non-conforming mobile homes which would permit individual mobile homes which are not located within a mobile home park to be replaced with other individual mobile homes or dwelling units. The Planning Board recommended denial of this proposed amendment because of the wording "or" dwelling units. The Planning Board does not want mobile homes replaced with stick-built homes. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Chair Willhoit to approve the Planning Staff's recommendation to approve the amendments as pre- sented to public hearing.