Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
O9. <br /> 14 <br /> Kramer seconded the motion. , <br /> VOTE: In favor (5) Watlers, Yuhasz, Pearson, Shankln, Kramer <br /> Opposed: (2) Pilkey, Gordon <br /> MOTION: Yuhasz moved to revise condition #7 to read asphaltic <br /> treatment. <br /> Motion died for lack of a second. <br /> Shanklin questioned the applicant;s intention. <br /> The Board by consensus, did not revise condition #14. <br /> Shanklin addressed condition#11. He indicated that rural <br /> routes only allowed mail delivery on public, not private <br /> roads. He indicated that the provision of cluster mailboxes <br /> could not be dictated but could only be subject to a <br /> decision made by the applicant in consultation with the <br /> postal authorities. <br /> Shanklin moved to revise condition #11 to read "Mailboxes <br /> which are clustered <br /> The Board approved of this revision by Consensus. <br /> VOTE ON MOTION FOR APPROVAL: <br /> In favor: (4) Walters, Yuhasz, Pearson, Shanklin <br /> Opposed: Gordon, Kramer and Pilkey <br /> Pilkey moved to extend the meeting. <br /> The Board approved of the extension by consensus. <br /> Agenda Item #7e: ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS <br /> 7.e.2 Non-profit Educational Cooperative <br /> Yuhasz questioned "direct access" under item 8.8.4.2d) . <br /> Gordon responded it meant frontage. <br /> MOTION: Yuhasz moved to revised 8.8.4.2d to read "frontage on". <br /> Pilkey seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: IN FAVOR: (5) Pearson, Walters, Yuhasz, Kramer, Pilkey <br /> OPPOSED: Shanklin, Gordon <br /> MOTION: Pilkey moved approval of Article 8.8.4. as amended. <br /> Walters seconded the motion. <br /> MOTION AMENDMENT: Yuhasz moved to delete 8.6.4.2d) as too restrictive. <br />