Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-11-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 06-11-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 2:40:58 PM
Creation date
9/9/2016 4:15:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/11/1985
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> boundaries and situated between Sunrise Road (SR 1732), 1-40 and Weaver Dairy <br /> 0 Road (SR 1733). The purpose of the request is to allow development of a <br /> planned single-family residential community composed of 108 lots. The 19.2 <br /> acres located in the Town of Chapel Hill's jurisdiction is zoned R-2 and the <br /> applicant is presently pursuing subdivision approval for this parcel for an <br /> additional 26 lots. <br /> The property is known as Lot 17 of Map 17 and Lots 7 and 11 on Tax Map <br /> 25 in Chapel Hill Township. The properties located within an area designated <br /> Ten Year Transition in the Orange County Land Use Plan. That designation <br /> allows the consideration of application for rezonings to any of the <br /> residential zoning districts (R-1 through R-13). The present zoning <br /> classification of the property is Residential-1. The requested designation is <br /> PD-H R-2, Residential 2. Certain development standards must be met and a <br /> Special Use Permit must be obtained by the development to proceed. <br /> Approval of the request would allow development of the property for <br /> single family residences on lots containing a minimum of 20,000 square feet. <br /> Collins referenced Article 8.2.2 and noted that if it is found that the <br /> project is in compliance with all required regulations and standards, the <br /> application must be approved unless it is found that it will not promote the <br /> public health, safety and general welfare, will not enhance or maintain the <br /> value of contiguous property or is not in compliance with the general plans <br /> for the County. <br /> He then referenced the findings of fact and pointed out the areas where <br /> Staff found that the applicant is not in compliance and those areas where the <br /> applicant is requesting a modification of the ordinance provisions. <br /> The first negative finding relates to access to the site, including <br /> sight distances on all roads used for access. Access from Weaver Dairy and <br /> Sunrise Roads is shown and visibility triangles are provided on the plan, but <br /> sight distances are not indicated on the site plan. This funding could be <br /> resolved by simply making sight distance notations on the plat. <br /> The next negative finding relates to the requirement for a 100-foot open <br /> space to be provided along the perimeter of a PD-H district. The applicant <br /> has requested waiver of the 100-foot open space requirement as provided in the <br /> narrative. Applicant proposes a 100 foot buffer along the 1-40 right-of way <br /> and vegetated buffers of 30' and 50' in accordance with Chapel Hill buffer <br /> requirements on Sunrise and Weaver Dairy Roads respectively. <br /> The final negative finding concerns the maximum floor area ratio which <br /> is exceeded by 3%. Staff recommendation on this is to reduce the average <br /> dwelling size to 2475 sq. ft. to bring this project into compliance. <br /> Mayor Nassif inquired as to how the public hearing was being held if the <br /> applicant was not in compliance with the Ordinance. <br /> Collins stated that the applicant can request a modification. Such a <br /> modification can be made by the Board of Caumissioners under section 7.3 of <br /> the article dealing with Planned Developments. In this case, the maximum <br /> floor ratio and sight distance requirements could be satisfied either by <br /> graphic changes to the site plan or conditions attached to the approval of the <br /> application. <br /> Mayor Nassif again questioned the order in which the County reviews <br /> exemption requests before allowing an application for Planned Development to <br /> be presented for Public Bearing. He indicated we are dealing with a <br /> development that does not comply with the Ordinance. <br /> Gledhill stated the 100' buffer can be altered by the Board of County <br /> Commissioners if it finds as part of its review process that the applicant's <br /> 0 proposed buffer meets the public safety and welfare requirements to an equal <br /> or greater degree. The County has considered such requests as part of the <br /> public hearing process. This applicant has a proposal for buffering in the <br /> area where they have not met the 100' requirement. They are going to try to <br /> persuade you that they have satisfied the purpose behind the 100' buffer <br /> requirement to an equal or greater degree. The purpose of that 100' buffer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.