Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-11-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 06-11-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 2:40:58 PM
Creation date
9/9/2016 4:15:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/11/1985
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARTICLE 7 - SPECIFIC STANDARdS FOR-EVALUATION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS {Continued} <br /> Planning Staff <br /> Ordinance Requirements Recommendations Based on Planning Board <br /> .Ubmit d Aaplication Evidence Submitted To Supeort Findin s Recommended Findings <br /> Article 7.14.3 sets forth "site <br /> planning" standards with which <br /> an applicant must comply. <br /> Standards regarding "external <br /> relationships" are as follows: <br /> Two access points are propsed via a public <br /> a)l. Access points X Yes No ropd, Sjegte Creek Road, to Weaver Dairy Road <br /> encourage smooth trafficded to '-- <br /> flow with controlled turn- improvements tod both Prroads. Sight di Yes No <br /> ing movements and minimum Sight distances at points of <br /> access are acceptable to NCDOT. No minor streets are <br /> hazard to vehicular or affected by this proposed development. <br /> pedestrian traffic. Use of <br /> minor streets by substan- <br /> tial traffic is discouraged. <br /> a)2, Safe and convenient routes X Yes No Applicant has provided <br /> provided for pedestrians. `-- P pedestrian ways Yes No <br /> Crossings are throughout site to points of ingress to ' <br /> safely marked, located and site. Applicant also provides 30' greenway <br /> controlled, pedestrian easement within the Duke Power <br /> easement. <br /> a}3. Visibility provided at inter- X Yes No <br /> sections (pedestrian and vehicular) Visibility at intersections complies with Yes No <br /> in accordance with Article 6.8. Section 6.8. . Signage details indicatedsign <br /> a)4, 100-foot open space provided Yes No located at edge of 25'x25' visibility triangle.. <br /> along per:i,meter of PD-H district. — -'�'' Applicant has requested waiver of 100' open Yes No <br /> Recreational use and off-street space requirement as provided in the narrative. <br /> parking set back at least 75 feet Applicant proposes a 100' buffer along the 1-40 <br /> of district boundary. right-of-way and vegetated buffers of 30' and 50'Hill .a)5. Yards, fences, walks or X Yes No alongcSunrise andhWeaverlDairy Roadsrrespectively. <br /> vegetation provided to screen <br /> off undesirable views, tight Appli-cant provides 1001 buffer along proposeG Yes No <br /> ing, noise, etc. Parking/ 1-40jeffectively screening the residential units, <br /> loading areas and refuse coliec- Staff recommends that the recreation parking facility <br /> tion/storage areas screened. be relocated and screened from Sweeten Creek Road. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.