Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-11-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 06-11-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 2:40:58 PM
Creation date
9/9/2016 4:15:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/11/1985
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARTICLE 7 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS (Contlnued) <br /> Planning Staff <br /> :Recommnd,a.tions..Based on Planning Board <br /> Ordinance Requirements Submitted Application Evidence Submitted To Support Findings Recommended Findings <br /> 1 <br /> Article 7.4 then indicates the <br /> application must comply with <br /> certain specific requirements <br /> common to all Planned Develop- <br /> ments. These include: <br /> 7.4.1 so located with respect to X Yes —No Direct access is provided via proposed <br /> major streets and mass transit Sweeten Creek Road to weaver Dairy Road, Yes No <br /> facilities and designed so as not an arterial , and Sunrise Road. No minor <br /> to create traffic on minor streets residential streets will be affected by this <br /> in residential districts project as designed. <br /> 7.4.2 so located with respect to Yes No Applicant Yes No <br /> water, sewer, and storm drainage '—- PP proposes to extend public water ____ <br /> facilities that enlargement or and sewer facilities to the site and install <br /> stormwater management facilities on-site to <br /> extension will net result in serve the development. Cost of installation is <br /> higher net public cost or earlier to be borne by the applicant. <br /> incursion of public cost . <br /> and <br /> So located with respect to Yes _ No Letters re Yes No <br /> police:fire and rescue services, '-" ggrding adequate service provision <br /> and schools and parks so as to have been received from police, fire and rescue <br /> services. The service level necessitated by this <br /> have access in the. same manner development is compatible with other developments <br /> as permitted under the existing <br /> zoning in the vicinity. <br /> 7.4.3 Site suitable for develop- X Yes No Soil surveys/ topographic/f166d maps indicate_Yes No' <br /> meat without hazard from flooding, stream crossing site in southeasterly direction.' <br /> erosion, and soil subsidence or <br /> slipping Applicant proposes drainage easements along stream <br /> and other draina ewe s. Site slo e_ s <br /> g Y p gentle to <br /> moderate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.