Agenda - 06-11-1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

ARTICLES 8.6 AND 8.8 - APPLICATION COMPONENTS (Continued) ' Planning Staff Findings Based on Panning Board Ordinance Requirements Submitted Application Evidence Submitted to Support Findings Recommended Findings 4. Location of all existing or pro- X Yes No Development is proposed for single-family Yes posed structures on the site housing; Typical lot layout details are —Na Provided. Structures proposed for the recreation area are indicated. S. location of all areas on the site X Yes No There are no flood prone areas on the site Yes No subject to flood hazard or inunda- according to �the Flood Insurance Rate Map tion as shown on flood maps or soil maps {FEMA-FIA) and soils maps. 6. Location of all water courses X Yes No All water courses and direction of flow are on the site, including the �"— indicated on the site plan. -'- Yes No direction of flow 7. Existing topography at a contour X Yes No Topography at five foot contours is shown interval of five (5) feet based on the site plan: Yes No on mean sea level datum 8. Proposed or existing fencing, dyes No screening, gates, parkin g' -- Parking area for recreation facilities is Yes No indicated. No other fencing,service and storage areas g, gates, screen#;rrg service and/or storage areas are proposed. 9• Access .to•.site' includtng.� sight Yes 2No Access to site from Weaver Dair and Sunrise distances on all roads used for _.._ y Yes No access . Roads is shown. Visibility triangles are provided. Sight distances are not indicated on 0. Elevations of all structures the site plan. proposed to be used in the X Yes No Development sumroary specifies maximum . ,..Yes No development. building height, of 251. Individual building details not available for single-family development, 1 . Names and addresses of owners X Yes No and applicants Provided in application, Yes No 2. A fee, as set by the Board of X Yes � County Commissioners —" '—No $x+90.00 application fee paid. Yes No