Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-28-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 05-28-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 2:28:18 PM
Creation date
9/9/2016 3:19:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/28/1985
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br /> PERTAINING TO <br /> APPLICATION: ` -z=7-85 George Horton <br /> BASED ON THE APPLICATION MATERIALS S.UBMiTTED, THE PLANNING STAFF <br /> RECOMMENDS THAT THERE IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING {"Yes" indicates compliance; "No" indicates Noncom pliance <br /> PLANNING STAFF PLANNING <br /> FINDINGS BASED ON BOARD <br /> SUBMITTED APPLICATION EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS RECOMMENDED <br /> Ordinance Requirements FINDINGS <br /> The application must comply <br /> with all requirements speci- <br /> fied In.Article 20 - Amend- <br /> . ments. Those requirements <br /> i ncl ude: <br /> 20.32 a} Map showing affected Yes No Site Plan provided at scale of Yes No <br /> property at scale of not less 1�'mI00' <br /> than I '= 10011 nor more than 1'= <br /> 20' <br /> 20.3.2 b) Legal description of Yes No Description provided with application Yes No <br /> property <br /> 20.3.2 c} Expl'an`ation of alleged X Yes No No error alleged Yes No <br /> error, if any, to be corrected by <br /> proposed amendment <br /> 20.3.2 d) Changed conditions, if X Yes No The 1-1 property Is Located next to the Yes No <br /> any, which make amendment reasons- � interstate and other property'•zoned 1-3 <br /> biy necessary to promote public and•&C-4. TheOI prbperty•would -be buffered from <br /> health, safety and general welfare. the present 1-3 zone by-the 1-1 -and located along <br /> ' U:S. 70 Business. <br /> 20.3.2 e} Manner in which proposed X Yes No. .�.,YPs• <br /> The property is located in a Ten Year . �o <br /> amendment will carry out purpose ' Transition Area and Commercial Industrial <br /> and Intent of adopted Comprehensive Transition Activity Commercial <br /> Plan. � <br /> - iti? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.