Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-28-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 05-28-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 2:28:18 PM
Creation date
9/9/2016 3:19:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/28/1985
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br /> in the best interest of the neighborhood; and asked that if approved the Health <br /> Department would investigate the park within thee months. <br /> David Squires, Jr. expressed concerns regarding traffic impacts and <br /> childrens activities in the area; about the quality of people likely to reside <br /> in the park, and the quality of water supply in the area. <br /> Michael Chiorazzi expressed concerns regarding the sketchy plans, site <br /> slope and visual problems, traffic, and the nature of the present community to <br /> be changed by the park. <br /> Kent Mann indicated he felt this was a better approach and provided more <br /> control that individual lot or subdivision development. <br /> Garrett questioned the appraisal submitted, noting it was a guess and <br /> questioned the materials made available to the appraiser. He expressed <br /> concerns with not being able to question the appraiser. He noted the appraiser <br /> needed access to drawings and plans and cited landscaping plans he had that Tom <br /> Squires was given access to, but that he had not received a request for from <br /> the appraiser. <br /> Bledsoe responded that the appraiser had access to everything she had <br /> received from staff. <br /> A.......mmunsiox REGULATIONS TEXT AMENDMENTS <br /> PRIVATE ROADS <br /> The presentation was made by Marvin Collins. Carl Walters cited the <br /> problem encountered by his neighbor in subdividing property. <br /> Alton Cummings described his concern and inability to subdivide his land <br /> to give his sons homesites with a 30' right-of-way versus a 60' right-of-way. <br /> Commissioner Wilhoit asked if a variance could be granted. Smith <br /> responded there were no variances granted to Subdivision Regulations. <br /> Commissioner Carey questioned the 60' right-of-way. Susan Smith responded <br /> 50' was required. <br /> Cummings noted the land was to be used for family only. Commissioner <br /> Lloyd asked how planning staff could address this. Smith responded staff had <br /> proposed this amendment to address similar problems. Lloyd asked Cummings to <br /> contact planning staff to see if what is being proposed will allow him to <br /> subdivide his land. <br /> Henry McDonald noted he is presently unable to subdivide a lot so as to <br /> receive a building permit on land he purchased by deed as he is unable to <br /> secure additional access beyond a 12' right-of-way. <br /> NATERSHEp STANDARDS <br /> The presentation was made by Marvin Collins. <br /> Yuhasz questioned the difference between the Town proposal which applies <br /> the stream buffer standard from the stream versus the County proposal which <br /> applies it from the edge of the flood plain. Collins responded staff proposed <br /> that current County Standards dictate. <br /> Yuhasz expressed concern with utilizing United States Geological (USG) <br /> maps for applying this standard as they are not intended for this purpose. <br /> Commissioner Lloyd noted that this could result in restricting use of many <br /> acres of land in certain areas. <br /> Yuhasz expressed concern with unnessarily restricting uses allowed under <br /> the current floodplain ordinance from occurring and that these proposals are <br /> not thought out well. <br /> 7- ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS-EDUCATIDN4 QOOPERATIVES <br /> The Presentation was made by Planner Susan Smith. <br /> Willhoit questioned regulating toxic materials. Smith responded it was a <br /> provision desired by the Planning Board. <br /> Chris Herndal described the needs of the Health Sciences Consortium. <br /> Willhoit asked the relationship between use of the facility for staff <br /> versus a retreat facility. Herndal responded 20 - 30 full time staff were <br /> proposed with some use of the facility for training purposes. <br /> No formal presentation was made nor comments received on the remaining <br /> public hearing items: Amendments to Article IV-Establishment of Permitted Use <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.