Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
moan=IN <br /> 00ant of Sludgc produced <br /> t,'d jO!.ir.SOr. a-SIONP;CA .11011 rl-IPICI 6he aB <br /> C-Ias gro-wing- eaah year. Pliliiamson responded 3"S a year, but <br /> iderably <br /> n•.-ted requi-remnents fror phosphorus removal would cons- <br /> I <br /> iac-ease 16h4z amount and that was looking for <br /> L <br /> t <br /> ernati-.re disposal methods. . <br /> Ed j oh. son asked what. land in er.cess of the amount <br /> needed to dispose of 3 m i illion gallons of sludge was under <br /> T I- <br /> U1.71MI control. relilli-amson responded to allow fle*-%oibility in <br /> mana5=men4- o-'� the prgram re application. Jol-aison asked what <br /> I A. I <br /> ailliamson responded 50 , <br /> additional land would OWASA desire. t <br /> more. <br /> Foust inquired if .injection versus surface application <br /> would solve odor and runoff problems. <br /> The issue of bad weather and sludge application was <br /> di-mdussed. Villiamson indicated that if sites ifere und.er <br /> MNIASIN can trol Ort.kSA could reapir any on-site darmayew' . <br /> Hartley indicated that the co-mmunity needed more then <br /> OWASA assurances. <br /> Rubin ind4 cated that sludge is head in holding tanks <br /> t�uring inclement w eather. I Tilliamson responded that these <br /> L:inks are designed for 2.0 days for heating 8 million gallons. <br /> Eartley qA 0.0 -corrie <br /> .,aesti.oned if adjacent owners ::ere ctly <br /> he uses of the Darham Heirs tract. <br /> -ror- - tine-n,- med or potent <br /> Ed Johnson asked if hospital waste%rater was treated <br /> differently. (fill ia-If-son responded it received special <br /> ,:soinitarng.Hartley e=pressed concern 'Chat CT.*�'.ASA apei7ationa on <br /> o*w-nGd, land was. not a• legeti"malCe fa_rming activity. <br /> Rubin indicat-ed the permits were issued for a finite <br /> period of t4miej i.e. : 2-5 years and that -siteu received <br /> extensive soil, vegelation and groundwater mon-It-oring. if <br /> 1*11 Hermit u-ould not 1-4e <br /> Celatel-ous impacts w=ere ider.-Lified tle p <br /> reissued. go noted that adverse irgpacts -viould be obviou 's on <br /> a Fie eLiiphasized <br /> . .e before they :could b seen do,:-n.strea.m. <br /> the soil will given <br /> th,'Cat t1he cationic exchange capacity of <br /> LISe C)f A--e Site <br /> L�LA <br /> Edle-man stressed the concern vith conficence leve.is <br /> :-ecarding adverse affects. He asked if would <br /> the liability for well repair and repincement -if <br /> 3 -.sv I-''e d from the o r.e ra-ion.ion. Williamson reoponde, -hat 0 <br /> would * <br /> wld pon <br /> be ressible. Rubin not-Get EPA qu. I <br /> the suc�.sr. <br /> via wa!;tavratar treal C-11t OPtiOPS F-I <br /> f IMovative alternat.L <br />