Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
6 0 7E <br /> trouble-free and takes up less space than a <br /> traditional system. <br /> Pilkey also noted that Lot #14 was shown as <br /> questionable. Kirk responded that the Health <br /> Department had not yet found suitable sites. It is <br /> possible that the areas marked questionable may not <br /> be used at all. <br /> Mr. Sneed stated that only one site had been tested <br /> but that he was willing to pay permit, fees for the <br /> remainder of the acreage to be tested for <br /> suitability. <br /> Kizer noted that the property could be subdivided <br /> even if some of the lots were not usable. <br /> Yuhasz inquired about lot 11. <br /> Smith responded that all those lots in square <br /> were under Durham County's jurisdiction and the <br /> applicant has not yet applied to Durham County for <br /> subdivision of these lots. <br /> Notion: Pearson moved approval. Seconded by Shanklin. <br /> Vote: 6 in favor. <br /> 2 opposed. <br /> Pilkey opposed due to the feeling that more cars <br /> and more development are not needed on Craig Road. <br /> Gordon opposed due to incomplete information <br /> regarding water and sewer. <br /> Smith explained the preliminary and final process <br /> lii for the benefit of new Board members. <br /> (Walters left at 8:05 p.m.) <br /> Item #7: Matters for Decision <br /> Presentation by Smith. <br /> ftgnd Oranag County` Pri gte Rogd. -X Standards to <br /> EJiminate- Requirement- for-Egad Signs on Rgadg. Less <br /> Than- 500 Peet, <br /> The purpose of this agenda item is to amend orange . <br /> II <br /> County Private Road Standards to eliminate the <br /> requirement for a road sign on Class C roads less <br /> than 500 feet in length. <br />