Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-06-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 05-06-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 2:08:20 PM
Creation date
9/8/2016 4:33:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/6/1985
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
315
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
03C <br /> 6 <br /> Smith added that there was no public water and <br /> sewer available in this area. <br /> Pilkey stated that she had questions on the LPP <br /> on the site plan. The Health Department told <br /> her that LPP menas Low Pressure Pipe system. <br /> According to Pearson, this kind of septic <br /> system is more trouble-free and takes up less <br /> space than -a traditional system. <br /> Pilkey also noted that Lot #14 was shown as <br /> questionable. Kirk responded that the Health <br /> Department had not yet found suitable sites. <br /> It is possible that the areas marked <br /> questionable may not be used at all. <br /> Mr. Sneed stated that only one site had been <br /> tested but that he was willing to pay permit <br /> • fees for the remainder of the acreage to be <br /> tested for suitability. <br /> • Kizer noted that the property could be <br /> subdivided even if some of the lots were not <br /> usable. <br /> Yuhasz inquired about lot 11. <br /> Smith responded that all those lots in <br /> were under Durham County's jurisdiction and the <br /> applicant has not yet applied to DurhamCounty <br /> for subdivisionof these lots. <br /> Motion: Pearson moved approval. Seconded by Shanklin. <br /> Vote: 6 in favor. <br /> 2 opposed. <br /> Pilkey opposed due to the feeling that more <br /> cars and more developmentare not needed on <br /> Craig Road. <br /> Gordon opposed due to incomplete information <br /> • regarding water and sewer. <br /> Smith explained the preliminary and final <br /> process for the benefit of new Board members. <br /> (Walters left at 8:05 p.m.) <br /> Item #7: Matters for Decision• <br /> Presentation by Smith. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.