Agenda - 05-06-1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

02S 5 Durham County, . 5.3 acres of the 40.09 acre • tract is within Durham County. The applicant • is requesting approval of those lots wholly within Orange County. Public roads constructed to state standards are proposed for the subdivison. The property is located within an Agricultural -Residential area designated in the Orange County Land Use Plan. That designation permits single-family residential housing. The present zoning classificatnion of the propertyt is Agricultural-Residential (A-R) . This tract was originally proposed as Oakwood esates, a planned development-housing project that was submitted for the public hearing on February 28, 1985. The applicant has subsequently withdrawn his request for a special use permit in order to pursue this subdivision request. Approvalof the request would allow a 33-lot subdvision to be constructed on the site. Development of a 33-unit subdivision would add 178 trips per day to craig road. The 1982 average daily traffic count on Umstead Road is 1200 ADT. The Durham County division of Dot estimates that the traffic count at this point on Craig Road is 500 - 700 ADT. The Planning Staff recommends approval. Gordon noted that the checklist was incomplete. The source of water supply was not check on the list and also the type of dwelling units that would be placed in the subdivision. Kirk responded that with a sstraight subdivisio there could be either mobie. homes or stick- built houses. The water supply will be individual wells. Pearson noted that since a straight subdivision could have either mobiles or stick-built homes, the question of type of dwelling units would not matter. Margison questioned 'individual wells and septci/tanks. The owner Mr. Sneed noted the lots would be sold as individual lots and would all have wells and septic tanks. Wer--