Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-06-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 05-06-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 2:08:20 PM
Creation date
9/8/2016 4:33:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/6/1985
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
315
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
06E <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda <br /> ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item No. V:15 <br /> Meeting Date: MAY 6, 1985 <br /> SUBJECT: CETA REPAYMENT <br /> DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: __Yes X No <br /> ATTACHMENT(S): INFORWTICIst CONTACT: MANAGER'S <br /> OFFICE, X501 <br /> TELEPHONE NUMBER: <br /> NO Hillsborough - 732-8181 <br /> Chapel Hill - 968-4501 <br /> Mebane - 227-2031 <br /> PURPOSE: TO consider repaying Fiscal Year 1978-79 di ]lowed Comprehenr <br /> sive Employment and.Training Act (CA) costs to the N. C. <br /> Department of Natural Resources and Comaunity Development <br /> (MD). <br /> NEED: In October 1983 NRCD auditors conducted a financial, audit of <br /> County CETA contracts covering fiscal years 1978 through 1983. <br /> Auditors questioned $1.5 million of expenditures because of <br /> insufficient documentation. During calendar year 1984 the <br /> finance staff reviewed five years of voluminoug COM records and <br /> net with NRCD periodically to reduce a major portion of the <br /> questionable costs. In February 1985 NRCD informed the County <br /> $7,453 of costs remain disallowed. The specific cost relates to <br /> 1978-79 OJT subgrantee contracts in which County initiated <br /> contract provisions stipulated a reimbursement rate greater (80% <br /> to 100%) than the prescribed federal reimbursement rate (50%). <br /> The subgrantees paid CETA participants the correct amount, <br /> however, the subgrantees received 30% to 50% more funds than <br /> required by federal regulations. Although the finance staff and <br /> NRCD have been engaged in numerous conversations since February, <br /> the disallowed costs have not been resolved or reduced. <br /> IMPACT: All avenues for dal have been exhausted. NRCD has requested <br /> repayment of funds.• <br /> RECOMMENDATION: <br /> Authorize expending $7,453 from Commissioners Contingency <br /> Account to repay NRCD for 1978-79 disallowed CETA costs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.