Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-01-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 04-01-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 1:48:24 PM
Creation date
9/8/2016 3:58:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/1/1985
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> 118 <br /> DR/IF) <br /> 14 <br /> interim of operation; rehabilitation <br /> reclamation plans, and local need. <br /> MOTION: Greenberg moved approval. Seconded by <br /> • Pilkey. <br /> There was much discussion about the <br /> • - 100' setback. <br /> _ MOTION: ' Kizer moved that the 100 ' setback be <br /> changed 250' . Seconded by Laszlo. <br /> VOTE: - 8 in favo-r. <br /> 2 opposed. - <br /> MAIN MOTION RESTATED: Approval recommended with the 100' <br /> setback changed to 250' . <br /> VOTE: 9 in favor. <br /> 1 opposed. <br /> • <br /> 9b.4 Zoning ordinance Text Amendment - <br /> Article 8. <br /> The purpose Of this agenda item is to <br /> consider a proposed amendment to <br /> • Article 8 ,apecial Use Permits, of the <br /> Orange County Zoning Ordinance <br /> submitted to public hearing on February <br /> 25, 1985 and March 12, 1985 for <br /> recommendation to the Board of <br /> Commissioners.. <br /> • <br /> Section 8.8 Eeoulations Governing <br /> Individual Special Use requires <br /> applicants for special use permits to <br /> • submit seven (7) copies of a Class A <br /> • Special Use Permit site plan and twenty - <br /> • (20) copies of a Class B Special Use <br /> • Permit site plan. The number of copies - <br /> • required for these submittals is - <br /> • insufficient to provide for adequate <br /> project review. Submittals are <br /> reviewed for comment, recommendation <br /> and approval by the Planning <br /> Department, Planning Board, Board of <br /> Commissioners, Board of Adjustment, <br /> emergency services • agencies, school <br /> districtsr the towns of Chapel Hill: <br /> Carrboro and Hillsborough, the Orange <br /> County Recreation Advisory Board and <br /> • the Department of Transportation. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.