Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-01-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 04-01-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 1:48:24 PM
Creation date
9/8/2016 3:58:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/1/1985
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> 113 <br /> • <br /> • <br /> 3 <br /> Regulations to the change in the <br /> state enabling legislation. <br /> Gordon asked Gledhill to clarify <br /> what is meant by. "deed" and <br /> • "recorded". Gledhill responded a <br /> deed was a document and recorded <br /> meant the process of registering an <br /> instrument with the Register of <br /> Deeds. • <br /> Gordon questioned invalidity of the <br /> Orange County provisions. Gledhill <br /> responded the Court would amend our <br /> • regulations to conform with State <br /> law. <br /> Yuhasz inquired what "previously", <br /> • refers to. Gledhill responded <br /> previous to Change in law. Yuhasz <br /> • further questiond if it was previous <br /> to recombination attempt or previous . <br /> to the ordinance citing the example <br /> • of recombination of an illegal <br /> • subdivision. Gledhill responded <br /> that previous refers not to the <br /> recombination attempt, but to the <br /> change in the law. <br /> Kizer suggested it would be clearer <br /> to put the date in. Gledhill <br /> responded he did not recommend <br /> changing the definition to read <br /> other, that what the General <br /> • Statutes provides as Orange County <br /> cannot affect the definition of a <br /> subdivision, <br /> Yuhasz asked what the General <br /> Statutes state. Gledhill responded <br /> this was a verbatim transcript. <br /> • Yuhasz inquired about interpretation <br /> of it. Gledhill responded it would <br /> mean previous to the adoption of - <br /> Subdivision Regulations. He noted • <br /> there was no simple answer, and <br /> decisions would be made on a case by <br /> case basis. <br /> Commissioner Lloyd asked if a plat, <br /> • unless recorded, is invalid. <br /> Gledhill responded the subdivision <br /> would not entitle the property owner <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.