Agenda - 04-01-1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• sr . . 22 070 The staff presentation was made by Susan Smith. Commissioner Marshall questioned the staff on the justification used to • support this amendment. • Smith responded that the district is one of the two most intensive zoning districts in the ordinance and that uses of similar impact are permitted in this district. Chair Wilihoit inquired about the use of property zoned CC-3 specifically • for car sales, citing the property located at Watts/Star POint. Smith - responded that the property could be used for any use permitted in the CC-3 district according to the CC-3 district requirements. Assignment of a CC-3 • zoning district classification would require satisfaction of the application criteria for the district. • NOTE: COMMISSIONERMLKER LWE AT 10:15. • Commissioner Marshall asked if there were any other criteria to be applied to this use in a CC-3 district. Smith responded no additional criteria was proposed. Commissioner Marshall asked staff to review the characteristics of the CC- 3 district. Smith reviewed the definition of the district, its intent statem- , gent, the application criteria and the types of uses permitted in the district. She noted that this use is appropriate in this district, citing the range of uses permitted currently. Commissioner Marshall inquired about materials staff review to come to a decision on these natters. Smith cited Planning Advisory Service Reports and other planning research and support data, as well as other jurisdictions' ordinances. • 10. 7alar7ORDZS'ocsmr11 AMENDMEM-TEmPQRARY MOBILE HOMES The staff presentation was made by Susan Smith. • Cormissioner Marshall asked if a time limit should be set on the construc- tion period and presence of the temporary home. Chair Willhoit concurred. Yuhasz expressed concern that given the nature and use of temporary mobile homes, a time limit was inappropriate. Commissioner Marshall expressed concern about safety factors. Pearson indicated that excep't for the thirty day removal period there would not be two livable structures on the same site. He added that the perma rent or replacement structure would not be Occupiable until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued and that both the permanent and the temporary structure. must meet the requirements for issuance of the building permits. Smith verified that both structures must comely with applicable requirements. •