Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-01-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 04-01-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 1:48:24 PM
Creation date
9/8/2016 3:58:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/1/1985
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o . . <br /> 064 ..,.. <br /> southwestern corner along th " / <br /> southern western property lines. <br /> 0) ' <br /> Commissioner Lloyd stated that the <br /> applicant gave him the dimension <br /> 2001x3001 <br /> instead of the 200'x200' <br /> indicated on the abstract. 'V <br /> h, <br /> . 1 <br /> smith responded that the applicant .., <br /> i <br /> , <br /> had requested 260'.x300' but that N. ' <br /> staff's opinion was that a 200 'x200' <br /> ti <br /> lot was sufficient to accomodate the --, <br /> use and, therefore, staff recommended <br /> only a 200'x2001 iot for this use. <br /> ‘ . <br /> Planning Board member Wilson stated <br /> that he thought the greenhouse was <br /> an agricultural use and was <br /> permitted. <br /> ,.. _ . <br /> Smith responded that a greenhouse, <br /> without ....a.,pg B.Etvlise sales, was <br /> permieitd'fbritatffat this greenhouse <br /> would have on-premise sales. <br /> . . <br /> , <br /> I <br /> Commissioner Lloyd requested that 1 i <br /> Smith explain again the reason for 1 <br /> i <br /> Planning Staff's recommendation of , 0 <br /> 200'x200' instead of the 200'x300' 1 ' <br /> 1 ,.. <br /> _ . <br /> requested by applicant. .._, <br /> 1 1 <br /> _ . <br /> ' <br /> Smith responded that in staff's 1 <br /> opinion, 200'x200' would accomodate <br /> 1 , <br /> the existing structure and any <br /> parking associated with that 1 <br /> structure. It was also staff's <br /> opinion that 200'x300' would be <br /> - _ <br /> excessive .- <br /> 1 <br /> . • <br /> - - - <br /> _ Planning Board member Shanklin asked <br /> , <br /> Smith to check to be sure BC-5 would 1 <br /> be the correct distr given that it <br /> was not in existence as a business 1 <br /> _ • <br /> 1 <br /> prior to the Zoning Ordinance taking i <br /> effect. , <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br /> Smith responded that the structure 1 <br /> was in existence and the applicant <br /> had indicated that the purpose for • <br /> i <br /> the' structure was to have a 1 <br /> . commercial operation <br /> There was no public comment. <br /> , <br /> • <br /> . - <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.