Orange County NC Website
8 <br /> Bonnie Hammersley said at the last work session, the Food Council was inadvertently <br /> left out of the Manager's recommended budget. She said the Food Council did a presentation <br /> to the Board at the April 5, 2016 work session and did go through the outside agency process. <br /> Bonnie Hammersley said Chair McKee asked for an increase for the Meals on Wheels, <br /> as this agency expects a 4,000-meal increase. <br /> Yellow sheet: OUTSIDE AGENCIES <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said he suggested a proposal to broadly fund these agencies, <br /> and clarified what he is proposing. He said the Board recognizes the work that these non- <br /> profit agencies do in the community, and the Board discussed last year about raising the <br /> amount of funding for outside agencies. He said the difference between the agencies <br /> requests and the Manager's recommended budgets for those agencies is about $108,000, less <br /> $22,000 for Housing for New Hope. He suggested as a show of a united front, that the Board <br /> allocates the full amount to all of the agencies, for which the Manager recommended funding. <br /> Commissioner Rich asked if the $16,000 for the Food Council is in a particular pot at <br /> this point. <br /> Bonnie Hammersley said it is included as part of Commissioner Dorosin's proposal. <br /> Paul Laughton said the difference is $94,953 of what was requested for those that <br /> received funding in 2015-2016. He said if the $22,000 for Housing for New Hope is removed, <br /> and the $16,030 for the Food Council added back in, the total is $88,483. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said this would fully fund all agencies in line item number 1, all <br /> of which were Manager recommended for some funding. <br /> Commissioner Rich said some of these would be really big jumps in funding and asked <br /> if the Board is willing to go that far <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said yes, since this is an extraordinary time for these non-profits <br /> with the legislature. He said he is not recommending a policy change with the outside <br /> agencies. <br /> Commissioner Burroughs said she liked this proposal and suggested bringing back this <br /> discussion of increasing the amount of funding for outside agencies. She said these are the <br /> people she works with, and though she understands Commissioner Dorosin's rationale, she <br /> would prefer just funding the Manager's recommendations as of now. She said the <br /> applications were reviewed and funding decisions were made for a reason, and with careful <br /> thought. <br /> Commissioner Price echoed Commissioner Rich's point that fully funding some of these <br /> agencies would require a large jump from the Manager's recommended amount. She also <br /> echoed Commissioner Burroughs' point of respecting the decision making process thus far. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said he is sympathetic to Commissioner Dorosin's proposal, but <br /> the Board should agree not to raise any recommended funded agency more than 50% of its <br /> request. He said that may make other Board members more comfortable and also honor the <br /> process and the staff's work. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said that may be the way to proceed. He said the primary <br /> reason these agencies do not get full funding is because there is a limited pot of funding. <br /> He said if there is not support for his proposal, then he would defer to Commissioner Jacobs' <br /> proposal. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier appreciated Commissioner Dorosin's sentiment behind his <br /> proposal, but the other major thing to her is that departments submitted requests, as well as <br /> agencies and schools, and the staff and Commissioners must prioritize. She does not like <br /> supporting a blanket proposal and preferred going through each one. <br />