Orange County NC Website
i <br /> in schedulingg this variety provides more choice to the studeent.? <br /> In 1959 James H. Conant published SShool i <br /> Tod&v and drew public attention to the relationship of size and <br /> curriculum. In spite of the questions raised about his research <br /> and stateme.ntsabout the nature of American high schools, Conant'$ <br /> conclusion that "small high schools must be drastically reduced <br /> i <br /> through district reorganitaton" became popular opinion in the <br /> 1960se Conant maintained that "a high school must have a grad- <br /> uating class of at least one hundred to function adequately as a <br /> comprehensive school" and thus to provide a comprehensive edu- <br /> cational program. While thinking about Conant's position on size <br /> of school and curriculum* it is important to remember that the <br /> quality, not the quantityt of the courses is the significant <br /> factor, <br /> Staff utj,, i _et{en is another matter considered in relation ' <br /> to school size. In a,bigger school there is the possibility of <br /> better use of staff. It is often stated that a larger school al- <br /> lows for the better utilization of each teacher's talents. The <br /> teacher will have more opportunity to teach the subjects or age <br /> Ip <br /> levels to which he or she is best suited® The question remains, <br /> however, whether or not increased staff specialization produceffi <br /> quality education* <br /> The issue of pupil achievement is often related to size of <br /> l school. Does a larger school and school district with greater re- <br /> sources produce higher student achievement scores or more students <br /> entering college? All kinds of research can be found to support <br /> e ith er side of the question of <br /> student achievement and school size. � <br /> For example; Summers and Wolfe found that "higher achievement re- <br /> sults correlated with smaller schools at both the elementary and <br /> senior high .school level".!a On the other hand, Jantze - using a <br /> sample of 46 secondary schools in Nebraska which administered the <br /> Iowa Tests of Educational Development - determined that "achievement <br /> increased as enrollment increased to a point somewhere betwoen an : <br /> enrollment of 400 and 799".13 Still other studies have found "little <br /> or no significant difference in pupil achievement relative to <br /> school size". In general' though• recent research has concluded <br /> that "factors other than school size seen to be nor* important in <br /> . determining the degree of pupil achievement in school* factors <br /> such as student ability• educational attainment of a student's par- <br /> ent, and soeioeoehomic Atatuse In 1,96647 xinneseta public high <br /> JAIL <br />