Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-11-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 03-11-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2016 2:52:42 PM
Creation date
9/8/2016 2:21:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/11/1985
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' ---- - <br /> -he subiect o+ my discussion was the recent article in the Chapel <br /> Hill Newspaper concerning possible merger 0+ the Chapel <br /> Hill--Carrboro School System with the Orange County School System- <br /> Although a loose con+ederation where parent trict <br /> of sending their children to a closer school in the other dis <br /> it would be a <br /> without cost penalty might be useful , I believe that <br /> mistake to combine the two administratively. Before moving to this <br /> was activein School affairs in the <br /> area +our years ago hool system <br /> Montgomery County System in Maryland. This was a sc <br /> with over 95(.')Q0 students and a annual budget of more than <br /> :�,30million dollars in 1981. One ".^y.`` ^..^... that ._ _` _-m | <br /> per student the education available would be excellent. | <br /> � / <br /> Unfortunately that was not the case. Stud6nt/teacher ratios were | <br /> large administr�tpr/student ratios were low, school roofs leaked, <br /> � <br /> ' <br /> � <br /> and <br /> and materials were limited. Also because 0f the large schools <br /> distances to Board Meetings parent involvement in th e sc h oo ls |� <br /> d as in fact given lip service. The | <br /> although nominally encourage w Teachers <br /> whole system only had one volunteer program coordinator. <br /> salaries although higher` than here were significantly lower than ' <br /> d inistrative �alaries. The Superintendent,s salary was over, � <br /> am ' ! <br /> 70,000 dollars/year at that time. i <br /> i | <br /> � In my opinion a optimum size school system is between 4000ang . <br /> 7000 students. At this size the number of administrators can be | <br /> If problems occur in the schools <br /> kept to an efficient minimum. | <br /> parents can organize quickly and address them. The Board of | <br /> Education is not innundated with budgets in the hundreds of. | <br /> millions. olunteers can make maximum inputs. When 1 was in i <br /> � Maryland^ I did a small study of the effects of parent involvement . | <br /> on pupil performance. Admittedly, other factors play important � <br /> roles in this. In spite of that I feel that it is important to � <br /> stimulate as much as possible parent involvement. I feel that i <br /> making the system significantly larger both area wise and student � <br /> number wise is a mistal...:e' What is now 7 to 10 thousand students in . <br /> h 2O t� 4O / <br /> a combined district will later perhaps approac | <br /> thousand. Declining enrollment projections might tempt you to <br /> move toward consolidation., The experience in Maryland althougt | <br /> perhaps �t directly transferrab1e indicated that as the .community � <br /> �� d with wo�� families of childbearing aged a turnover occurre ring age <br /> accelerate in <br /> moving c loser to the urban center. Such trends may � <br /> ! <br /> � with the longterm uncertainties �n our energy <br /> | <br /> future especially »��� � <br /> � supplies. ~T ��v� ��* �Aam�d � ^ ~� ~��M� , ' <br /> _ <br /> ^ p^� � <br /> Robert R. Reeber S ^n- | <br /> Frank Porter Graham .Parent <br /> | / <br /> | / <br /> | <br /> ) <br /> . . <br /> | ! <br /> | ' <br /> � ` <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.