Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-25-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 02-25-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 12:12:14 PM
Creation date
9/8/2016 1:35:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/25/1985
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARTICLE 7 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATI'ONIPLANNED DEVELOPMENTS (Continued) ' <br /> Planning Staff <br /> Ordinance Requirements Findings Sased'on �. <br /> 5lihmitted Apoli cat ien - Evidence Submitted To Supi5ort Findinas Planning Board � <br /> Article „ ----__ a ommended Findin s. F-y <br /> 7.14.3 sets forth site <br /> planning" standards with which <br /> an applicant must comply. <br /> Standards regarding "external <br /> relationships" are as follows: <br /> a)1 . Access points provided to X Yes No All traffic• will obtain access via Craig <br /> encourage smooth traffic Road (SR 1450). Narrative submitted staes Yes No <br /> flow with controlled turn- <br /> sight distance at, intersections provides: safe <br /> ing movements and minimum <br /> hazard to vehicular or movement. Topography is•flat along Craig Road, <br /> Proposed entrances are separate by - 440 , ,lo <br /> pedestri-an traffic., Use of t <br /> minor streets are affected by -the proposed <br /> minor streets by substan- development. <br /> tial traffic is discouraged, <br /> 6)2, Safe and convenient routes X Yes ;No Applicant has indicated safe pedestrian <br /> provided for pedestrians routes through and..to.idpen and recreation ----Yes No <br /> and my marked to Crossings .-space. Pedestrian crossings are indicated <br /> safely marked, located and on the site plan, Staff recommends that <br /> controlled, <br /> pedestrian 'paths be -extended along the <br /> a)3. Visibility provided. at inter- _Yes No western property line and that a crossway be <br /> sections (pedestrian and vehicular) provided north of the triecreation parking lot..Yes No <br /> in accordance with Article 6.8', <br /> a)4. 100-foot open space provided X yd$• No Applicant has shown a 100-foot perirfieter Yes No <br /> a-long perimeter of PD-H. district. buffer along all the mobile home lots which <br /> Recreational use and off-street are adjacent to the property line. Adjacent <br /> parking' set back at least 75 feat property is similarly zoned and, therefore, <br /> of district boundary.. the property may be developed* to the lot lines <br /> a)5. Yards, fences, walks or" in accordance with the setbacks for the district. <br /> vegetation provided to screen X Yes No Applicant has indicated existing vegetation is Yes No <br /> off undesirable views, light-- is to be retained where possible. No screening <br /> ing, noise, etc. parking/ has been proposed adjacent to the parking <br /> loading areas and refuse collec- ..-- facility for the recreation area. _Staff is <br /> tion/storage areas screened, recommending that this parking area be redesi_ _ <br /> gned <br /> to effectively screen p6•rking. Solid waste collection <br /> is to be provided by a private contractor with <br /> individual trash cans at each home. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.