Agenda - 02-25-1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

045 RECOMMENDATIONS Article 8.2.2 states that where a preponderance of evidence • indicates compliahce with the general standards, specific rules governing the specific use, and that the use complies with all requi red regulations and.s tandards, the application must be approved unless it is found, in some specific manner, that: I. The use will not promote the public health, safety and general welfare.. . if located where proposed and developed and operated according to the plan as submitted; • 2. The use will not maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property; 3. The use is not in compliance with the general plans for the physical development of the county as embodied in these regu- • lations or in the Comprehensive Plan, or portion thereof, adopted by the Orange County Board of Commissioners. • The burden of proving one or more of the abiave findings is on those • opposing the application. The proof must also be in the form of competent material and substantial evidence. No information has been received which would establish grounds for making one or more of the above findings. The Planning Staff has reviewed the application, the site plan • • and all supporting documentation and has found that the applicant does comply with the general standards, specific rules, and required regulations. Staff recommends approval of the request. The Planning Staff does, however, recommend the attachment of conditions • to any, approval which are speci fied.in the abstract and which are.las follows: • • •- • • • • • • • • • _ _