Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-25-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 02-25-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 12:12:14 PM
Creation date
9/8/2016 1:35:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/25/1985
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br /> PERTAINI':NG TO <br /> APPLICATION: Z-3-85 ROBERT A. & RACHAEL S. SCHOLAR <br /> BASED ON THE APPLICATION MATERIALS .SUBMITTED, THE PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THERE IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING , <br /> FINDINGS: <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING <br /> Article 20.3.2 indicates that the application shall comply with the applicable sections of Article 20 <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING ("Yes" indicates compliance; "No" indicates noncompliance) <br /> PLANNING STAFF <br /> FINDINGS BASED ON PLANNING BOARD <br /> Ordinance Requirements SUBMITTED APPLICATION Evidence Submitted To Support Findings RECOMMENDED FINDINGS <br /> The application must comply <br /> with all requirements speci- <br /> fied in Article 20 - Amend <br /> ments. Those requirements <br /> include: <br /> 20.3.2 a) Map showing affected X Yes No Site Plan provided at scale of 1" = 100' • Yes No <br /> property at scale of not less <br /> than 1" = 100' nor more than <br /> 111 = 20' <br /> 20.3.2 b) Legal description X Yes No Description provided with application Yes No <br /> of property <br /> 20.3.2 c) Explanation of alleged X Yes No V No error alleged ales No <br /> error, if any, to be corrected by <br /> proposed amendment <br /> 20,3.2 d) Changed conditions, if X Yes No Applicant has indicated -the development Yes No <br /> any, which make amendment reasona- is adjacent to property currently zoned <br /> bly necessary to promote public R-10.' <br /> health, safety and. general welfare <br /> 20.3.2. e) Manner in which proposed : 'X Yes No Applicant indicated the property is located Yes No <br /> amendment will carry out purpose in a Ten-Year Transition area. <br /> and intent of adopted Comprehensive <br /> Plan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.