Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-19-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 02-19-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 11:53:55 AM
Creation date
9/8/2016 12:27:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/19/1985
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARTICLE 7 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS (Continued) <br /> PLANNJ NG•BOARD• •• • BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> Ordinance Requirements •RECOMMENDED FINDINGS Evidence Submitted Two Support Findings _ FINDINGS <br /> Article 7.4 then indicates the <br /> application must comply with <br /> certain specific requirements <br /> common to all Planned Develop- <br /> ments. These include: <br /> 7.4.1 so located wi-th respect to XYes No Direct access provided to Alexander Yes No <br /> major streets and mass transit Dickson Road then to- N.C. 86 which is-. '— <br /> facil.lties and designed so as not designated as an arterial. No traffic <br /> to -create traffic on minor streets will use minor residential s.treets. <br /> in residential districts <br /> 7.4.'2 so located with respect to X Yes No Extension of water/sewer services are Yes No <br /> water, sewer, and storm drainage necessary. Cost to be borne by the <br /> facilities that enlargement or developer. Water and sewer information <br /> extension will not result in on site plan and in na.rrative. <br /> higher net public cost or earlier <br /> incursion of.public cost <br /> and - <br /> So located with respect to X Yes No Development of site under R-1 district Yes No <br /> police,fire and rescue services, designation could result in as many 6 lots <br /> and schools and parks so' as to o r-dweliings. Proposed industrial center <br /> have access i'n the. same manner would have same access to services as <br /> as permitted under the existing 6 AwelIings. - <br /> zoning <br /> 7.4.3 Site suitable for develop- X .Yes, No Applicant indicates the site'has no Yes No <br /> ment without hazard from flooding, '—' drainage considerations. There are no _ <br /> erosion, and .soi 1 subsidence or, designated streams or flood hazard zones <br /> slipping within or adjacent to the development area: C <br /> cr <br /> C�'1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.