Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Gordon noted it was a judgement call and evidence needed to be cited. <br /> • Laszlo asked tliat• the conditions and general findings be revised <br /> at the same time. <br /> • <br /> Gordon reviewed the process for the Board indicating that the specific <br /> and general findings should be made and these• conditions specified <br /> • to overcome any deficiencies. <br /> Laszlo withdrew her motion. ' <br /> MOTION: - •. • <br /> Shanklin moved that the Board recommended that 8.8,2 has been <br /> satisfied and that the project be approved with the conditions. <br /> Greenberg seconded the motion., • <br /> MOTION • <br /> AMENDMENT: Yuhasz moved that the. Board recommend that the 100' setback be <br /> waived, as shown on the site plan as densities are R-5 on adjacent <br /> • property. - <br /> • <br /> Gordon asked why staff had not commented on this Smith responded <br /> that staff had failed to address the problem with a condition, but <br /> the-Planning Board could add. Collins added that Weatherstone was <br /> developed at R-8 densities. Smith clarified that there were <br /> inconsistencies between the use and the zoning.; <br /> Yuhasz suggested adding the wording "in recognition of actual de- <br /> velopment of the adjoining properties'!: <br /> MOTION REVISION: . Gordon revised the amendment to read ". . . because Weatherstone, <br /> is actually developed at i7--8 density and the other affected parcel <br /> is a sub station." 0 <br /> Laszlo seconded the motion. <br /> • <br /> • <br />